2021
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac175f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved spatial representation of a highly resolved emission inventory in China: evidence from TROPOMI measurements

Abstract: Emissions in many sources are estimated in municipal district totals and spatially disaggregated onto grid cells using empirically selected spatial proxies such as population density, which might introduce biases, especially in fine spatial scale. Efforts have been made to improve the spatial representation of emission inventory, by incorporating comprehensive point source database (e.g. power plants, industrial facilities) in emission estimates. Satellite-based observations from the TROPOspheric Monitoring In… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Panel h presents the same comparison focused on the NCP region. Intriguingly, there is a clear overestimation by GEOS-Chem in terms of column NO 2 for both the national scale (panel g, with a positive normalized mean bias (NMB) of 50.56%) and the NCP region (panel h, with a positive NMB value of 60.04%), as evident in panels g and h. This is potentially caused by the overestimation in the NO x emission intensity (Wu et al, 2021a), which could be estimated through assimilating the OMI observations via an emission inversion system (Jin et al, 2018(Jin et al, , 2019b.…”
Section: The Discrepancy Between Observation and Model Simulationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Panel h presents the same comparison focused on the NCP region. Intriguingly, there is a clear overestimation by GEOS-Chem in terms of column NO 2 for both the national scale (panel g, with a positive normalized mean bias (NMB) of 50.56%) and the NCP region (panel h, with a positive NMB value of 60.04%), as evident in panels g and h. This is potentially caused by the overestimation in the NO x emission intensity (Wu et al, 2021a), which could be estimated through assimilating the OMI observations via an emission inversion system (Jin et al, 2018(Jin et al, , 2019b.…”
Section: The Discrepancy Between Observation and Model Simulationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Disaggregating county level emissions traditionally consists of using spatial proxies like highways and major roads to allocate the emissions to grid cells, but this can introduce positive urban biases and negative urban biases at finer resolutions (Zheng et al 2017). These issues are being ameliorated by research on developing more accurate emissions inventories (Wu et al 2021. Lastly, additional uncertainty is introduced based on the number and distribution of monitors used to calculate the scaling factor for each pollutant because this varies by spatial domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temporal profiles of emissions are fundamental inputs for CTMs and play an important role on the model performance (Wu et al., 2019). The temporal distribution of emissions was determined by country in EMEP model (http://www.emep.int/grid/country_numbers.txt).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%