2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Target and Suspect Screening High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Workflows in Environmental Analysis by Ion Mobility Separation

Abstract: Currently, the most powerful approach to monitor organic micropollutants (OMPs) in environmental samples is the combination of target, suspect, and nontarget screening strategies using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS). However, the high complexity of sample matrices and the huge number of OMPs potentially present in samples at low concentrations pose an analytical challenge. Ion mobility separation (IMS) combined with HRMS instruments (IMS–HRMS) introduces an additional analytical dimension, providing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
129
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
5
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[56][57][58] Published collisional cross sections of vidarabine (156.4 Ų for [M+H] + ) and adenosine (156.9 Ų for [M+H] + ) measured on the same instrument are available, revealing a difference of only 0.5 Ų or 0.3%, which is too close to distinguish currently within the typical resolving power of ion mobility spectrometers. 59,60 M-H2O (18.0104) This study documents suspect screening efforts thus far for pharmaceuticals and their known TPs as a starting point for further understanding pharmaceutical levels in Luxembourgish surface waters. Other activities looking into different chemical classes such as pesticides 65 , industrial chemicals, and other emerging pollutants are ongoing.…”
Section: Spatio-temporal Distribution Of Pharmaceuticals Inmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…[56][57][58] Published collisional cross sections of vidarabine (156.4 Ų for [M+H] + ) and adenosine (156.9 Ų for [M+H] + ) measured on the same instrument are available, revealing a difference of only 0.5 Ų or 0.3%, which is too close to distinguish currently within the typical resolving power of ion mobility spectrometers. 59,60 M-H2O (18.0104) This study documents suspect screening efforts thus far for pharmaceuticals and their known TPs as a starting point for further understanding pharmaceutical levels in Luxembourgish surface waters. Other activities looking into different chemical classes such as pesticides 65 , industrial chemicals, and other emerging pollutants are ongoing.…”
Section: Spatio-temporal Distribution Of Pharmaceuticals Inmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Regarding identification of substances, the IM-derived CCS values can be used as further identification criteria in addition to m/z, retention time, isotopic pattern and fragment ions. It has been shown that CCS values are not affected by different matrices [34][35][36]. Thus, CCS values have a high potential to improve the confidence of compound identification [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that CCS values are not affected by different matrices [34][35][36]. Thus, CCS values have a high potential to improve the confidence of compound identification [35]. Several studies have already published CCS databases for different compound classes [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], which can be used to compare experimental CCS values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, in wide-scope screening approaches, the utilization of predictive CCS models facilitate and give more reliability to the tentative identification of suspect compounds ( Bijlsma et al, 2017( Bijlsma et al, , 2019Mullin et al, 2020 ). In front of this scenario, a refined workflow for target and suspect environmental analysis using IMS-HRMS data has been proposed (Celma et al, 2020 ), including complementary identification levels criteria for IMS and updating the criteria previously reported on confidence levels ( Schymanski et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%