1993
DOI: 10.1016/0169-5983(93)90024-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impulsive pressure due to wave impact on an inclined plane wall

Abstract: We obtain the expression of the pressure impulse distribution analytically on an inclined plane wall in an integral form by using Cooker and Peregrine's (22nd Int. Coni on Coastal Enq.; pp. 1473-1486 modeL We can evaluate the integral analytically when the impacting wave has a special form -that is, the normal component of fluid velocity on a wall just before impact has a particular distribution. The relation between the maximum pressure impulse and the inclination angle of a wall is investigated. Although, of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no singularity if the impact speed normal to the wall is chosen to decrease to 0 as y + 0, or if the wall slopes backward from the free surface. See Okamura (1993) or consider the solution obtained by choosing any other pressure-impulse contour to represent the free surface. The high, or singular, velocity change at the boundary may give an indication of the strength of any splash.…”
Section: The Velocity Field and The Splashmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no singularity if the impact speed normal to the wall is chosen to decrease to 0 as y + 0, or if the wall slopes backward from the free surface. See Okamura (1993) or consider the solution obtained by choosing any other pressure-impulse contour to represent the free surface. The high, or singular, velocity change at the boundary may give an indication of the strength of any splash.…”
Section: The Velocity Field and The Splashmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, based on a hydrostatic distribution, the measured pressure decreases to a constant value that is approximately equal to the calculated pressure. The first part signifies the generation of impulsive force owing to the initial collision of surge on the model (Cooker and Peregrine, 1995; Hattori et al, 1994; Okamura, 1993) which has a short-term duration in the time history. In most of the tests, this phase spanned for about 1–2 s. Considerable oscillations characterise this segment, which are caused by fluctuating surging water on the front of the structure, and high flow turbulence as well as culmination of the maximum force.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contrary to the previous simple vertical wall or horizontal decks, structures consisting of both vertical parapets and horizontal cantilevering slabs have scarcely been considered. A consensus on the necessary approach for the research of this type of structures lacks completely (Okamura 1993). In addition, the structure prevents most of the overtopping due to its particular geometry -involving closed angles, which do not allow incident waves to dissipate-the loading condition is more severe than the preceding situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%