2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In-house and on-field validation of the multiplex PCR assay developed for authentication of three commercially important shrimp species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of different DNA-based procedures have been used widely for the identification and authentication of economically important fish species ( Carvalho, 2018 ; Böhme et al, 2019 ; Carvalho, Sampaio & Santos, 2020 ; Barbosa, Sampaio & Santos, 2021 ; Wilwet et al, 2021 ; Roungchun, Tabb & Hellberg, 2022 ). However, this is the first study to develop multiplex PCR protocols for the identification and authentication of the three principal catfish species of the genus Brachyplatystoma exploited commercially in Brazil ( B. rousseauxii, B. vaillantii , and B. filamentosum ), and which are the frequent targets of fraudulent substitution ( Carvalho, 2018 ; Carvalho, Sampaio & Santos, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of different DNA-based procedures have been used widely for the identification and authentication of economically important fish species ( Carvalho, 2018 ; Böhme et al, 2019 ; Carvalho, Sampaio & Santos, 2020 ; Barbosa, Sampaio & Santos, 2021 ; Wilwet et al, 2021 ; Roungchun, Tabb & Hellberg, 2022 ). However, this is the first study to develop multiplex PCR protocols for the identification and authentication of the three principal catfish species of the genus Brachyplatystoma exploited commercially in Brazil ( B. rousseauxii, B. vaillantii , and B. filamentosum ), and which are the frequent targets of fraudulent substitution ( Carvalho, 2018 ; Carvalho, Sampaio & Santos, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their advantages, including their high yield and sensitivity, these modern methods require more complex laboratories, qualified personnel, and expensive reagents ( Creydt & Fischer, 2020 ; Pappalardo et al, 2022 ). Multiplex PCR, by contrast, is one of the traditional methods most used in forensic investigations, given its sensitivity, specificity, rapid throughput, relatively simple procedures, and low laboratory costs ( Veneza et al, 2017 ; Barbosa, Sampaio & Santos, 2021 ; Wilwet et al, 2021 ). Given this, the multiplex PCR protocols developed in the present study can be used routinely by fish processing plants to certify their products, and by government inspectors, to prevent fraudulent substitutions and mislabeling in the productive chain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Asian regions—Southeast, East, and South Asia—face recurring food contamination issues due to dense populations, limited resources, and relatively less focus on food research. China, Malaysia, and India have encountered such incidents, prompting researchers’ increased development and validation of food safety protocols (Girish et al., 2020; Sheu et al., 2021; Wilwet et al., 2021; Xing et al., 2020). Mycotoxin contamination in various foods, from barley to processed meats, remains a significant concern (Lago et al., 2021; Rausch et al., 2021; Zadravec et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2021).…”
Section: Food Authentication and Contamination In Asian Continentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved traceability tools represent, in fact, an essential support for FBOs who, in any case, hold the responsibility of verifying the identity of their products for consumer protection in accordance with EU legislation [31]. In this regard, rapid identification methods have been promoted and developed in recent years for the most traded species, potentially applicable to self-monitoring by various operators, especially at the distribution level [80][81][82]. 3 presents the results of the comparison between the scientific names found in association with the products and the official list of accepted trade names in force during the sampling period [45], and the updated list [46].…”
Section: Mislabeling Rate and Products Originmentioning
confidence: 99%