2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18082564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect Measurement of Ground Reaction Forces and Moments by Means of Wearable Inertial Sensors: A Systematic Review

Abstract: In the last few years, estimating ground reaction forces by means of wearable sensors has come to be a challenging research topic paving the way to kinetic analysis and sport performance testing outside of labs. One possible approach involves estimating the ground reaction forces from kinematic data obtained by inertial measurement units (IMUs) worn by the subject. As estimating kinetic quantities from kinematic data is not an easy task, several models and protocols have been developed over the years. Non-wear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
167
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
(169 reference statements)
0
167
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mannini et al discussed the computational algorithms for classifying human physical activity using on-body accelerometers [23]. Ancillao et al identified, selected, and categorized the methodologies for estimating the ground reaction forces from kinematic data obtained by inertial measurement units worn by the subject, laying the foundation for kinetic analysis and motion performance testing outside the laboratory [24].…”
Section: Motion Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mannini et al discussed the computational algorithms for classifying human physical activity using on-body accelerometers [23]. Ancillao et al identified, selected, and categorized the methodologies for estimating the ground reaction forces from kinematic data obtained by inertial measurement units worn by the subject, laying the foundation for kinetic analysis and motion performance testing outside the laboratory [24].…”
Section: Motion Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sabatini (2011) provides an overview of the use of inertial sensors for estimating segment and joint kinematics using physics-based techniques and sensor fusion algorithms [21]. Ancillao et al (2018) review physics-based techniques for estimating ground reaction forces and moments using wearable inertial sensors [40]. While these previous reviews capture the current state of physics-based techniques well, there has not been a comprehensive review of regression techniques for estimating joint, segment, and muscle kinetics and kinematics from wearable sensor data.…”
Section: Relevant Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regression regress* OR "machine learning" OR "artificial intelligence" OR "statistical learning" OR "supervised learning" OR "unsupervised learning" OR "neural network" OR perceptron OR "support vector" OR "gaussian process" wearable OR accelerometer OR gyroscope OR electromyo* OR EMG OR sEMG OR "inertial sensor" OR "inertial measurement unit" OR IMU OR insole OR goniometer used to estimate joint angles; two of which are also included here. Finally, Ancillao et al (2018) also reviewed machine learning techniques for estimating ground reaction forces and moments [40]. Thus, studies estimating only ground reaction forces and moments were excluded in this review.…”
Section: Review Relevant Item Search Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, there are a relatively great number of techniques and studies that include motion capture/analysis, vibration analysis, measurement of human performance, etc. [20][21][22][23], but there are few studies using infrared thermography (IRT). Nevertheless, the use of the IRT technique to evaluate skin temperature in health and sports is constantly growing, which shows the importance of this technique concerning performance in sports [24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%