“…However, as presented in the literature, different laser types, energy density, duration of treatment, and other parameters were used in the studies. Some researches show a faster skin repair, such as using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) light-emitting diode (LED) 880 nm, delivering 4 J/cm 2 and 50 mW/cm 2 for 14 consecutive days [6]; the aluminum-gallium-indium-phosphorus (AlGaInP) diode laser 670 nm, 25 mW/cm 2 , irradiating the total daily energy density of 30 J/cm 2 [7]; the helium-neon (He-Ne) laser, 632.8 nm, 10 mW, energy density of 1 J/cm 2 irradiated on the 1st, 5th, 8th, 12th, and 15th day after-wounding [8]; the VR-KC-610 Laser, Dentoflex, CW, Brazil, l670 nm, 9 mW, 0.031 W/cm 2 , 4 J/cm 2 , single irradiation after surgery [5]; and the NAFL and AFL treatments which were performed with the same total energy of 12,000 mJ cm 2 , with four sessions and an interval of 3 weeks between sessions. So with all the variability used in these studies, it is difficult to compare different results.…”