Influence of the Localization of Frontal Bone Defects on Primary Stability Values of 2 Different Implant Designs

Mercan, Uğur; Bilhan, Hakan; Meral, Deniz Gökçe; Kazokoglu, Sehnaz; Aykol-Sahin, Gokce; Geçkili, Onur

doi:10.1097/id.0000000000000536

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This study revealed a highly significant correlation between RFA and EPT scores (Table 4) per group. This observation corroborated the results reported from previous studies [21,22]. The modified drilling protocol for the type B implants recommended an underdimensioned preparation of the implant bed and differed hereby for group B2 from the standard protocol used for group B1 and group A implants.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone

Krischik¹,

Tokgöz²,

Orten³

et al. 2021

Dentistry Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The achievement of sufficient implant stability in poor quality bone seems to be a challenge. Most manufacturers develop special dental implants, which are claimed to show higher stability even in very soft bone. The aim of this experimental study was to compare two recently introduced dental implants with differing thread designs. A total of 11 implants of each group were inserted in the part of the fresh bovine ribs, corresponding to very soft bone. The primary stability was measured with resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and Periotest; the average of two measurements for each method and for each implant was taken and statistical analysis was applied. The highest stability values were obtained with the ICX Active Master implants, followed by the Conelog® Progressive-Line implants placed with the very soft bone protocol. The primary stability values of the Conelog® Progressive-Line implants inserted by the very soft bone protocol and the ICX Active Master implants placed with the standard protocol showed sufficient stability for immediate loading in low-density bone. Within the limitations of this study, the thread design of the implants and underdimensioned implant bed preparation seem to be effective for better primary stability in cancellous bone.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone

Krischik¹,

Tokgöz²,

Orten³

et al. 2021

Dentistry Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mercan et al created buccal bone defects on coronal, middle, and apical parts of the implants and determined the influence of these defects on ISQ values. 6 They reported that significantly lower ISQ values were noted in the coronal defect group than the other groups and the comparison of middle and apical defect groups showed no significant differences. Akça et al compared RFA values of implants inserted in conventional surgical sockets with circular bone defects at the coronal half and stated that the bone defect group had significantly lower ISQ values than control group with the reduction rate of 38%, from 66.31 to 40.88.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…5 The bone quantity around dental implants is mostly affected by cortical bone defects like dehiscence and fenestration because of surgical techniques, the differences of the bone resorption pattern, and anatomical features of the surgical site. 6 Peri-implant dehiscence is defined as the absence of bone initiating from the cervical portion of the implant, while peri-implant fenestration is defined as a buccal or lingual window defect leaving marginal bone at the coronal portion. 7 Immediate implant placement also presents specific challenges for achieving proper primary stability because of the geometric discrepancy between the design of implant and extraction socket.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Peri-Implant Bone Defect Type on Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Analysis: An in Vitro Study

DİKER¹,

DİKER²

2022

Turkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental implants are often preferred in the oral rehabilitation of patients with missing teeth due to their predictability and high success rate. Immediate loading of implant has gained popularity as a conse-quence of patients' increasing expectations in terms of shorter treatment period and aesthetic. 1 Primary implant stability is biomechanical stability that is affected by various factors such as surgical technique,

show abstract

“…According to the classification of Fleiss, 11 good to excellent results have been reported for the intraobserver and interobserver reliability values of EPT measurements in previously reported ex vivo models. 7,[12][13][14] However, it should be underlined that the EPT measurements from these reported studies were performed only using healing abutments, which had varying heights (3-4 mm).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The behavior of polyetheretherketone healing abutments when measuring implant stability with electronic percussive testing

Dayan

Bural

Geçkili

2018

Clin Implant Dent Rel Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background It is unknown whether it is possible to measure implant stability with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) healing abutments using electronic percussive testing (EPT). Purpose To investigate the reliability of the percussive test values (PTVs) measured with PEEK healing abutments and to compare them with the PTVs measured with titanium healing abutments. Material and Methods Thirty dental implants were inserted into the fresh pelvis belonging to a cow. Titanium healing abutments (2 and 5 mm), PEEK healing abutments (5 mm), and prepable standard titanium abutments (5 mm) were screwed to the implants, respectively, and PTVs were measured by two examiners using a wireless EPT device. Differences in PTVs between different dental implant components were evaluated using Friedman's test with post hoc Wilcoxon signed‐rank test and Bonferroni correction. Inter and intra‐observer reliabilities were detected using interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) Results The mean PTVs obtained using the PEEK healing abutments were significantly higher than the mean PTVs obtained using the other abutments for both examiners (P < .01). The ICCs for intra‐observer reliability were detected as poor for PEEK healing abutments; and excellent for the other abutment types for both examiners. The ICCs for the inter‐observer reliability between the two examiners were poor (0.25) for PEEK healing abutments, and excellent for the 2 and 5 mm titanium healing abutments and for standard abutments (0.82, 0.84 and 0.93, respectively). Conclusion Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it may be concluded that EPT measurements should be avoided using PEEK healing abutments because of the poor reliability.

show abstract

Influence of the Localization of Frontal Bone Defects on Primary Stability Values of 2 Different Implant Designs

Cited by 5 publications

References 33 publications

An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone

An In Vitro Evaluation of Primary Stability Values for Two Differently Designed Implants to Suit Immediate Loading in Very Soft Bone

Influence of Peri-Implant Bone Defect Type on Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Analysis: An in Vitro Study

The behavior of polyetheretherketone healing abutments when measuring implant stability with electronic percussive testing

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About