Integration and evaluation of haptic feedbacks: from CAD models to virtual prototyping

Chamaret, Damien; Ullah, Sadiq; Richard, Paul; Naud, Mickael

doi:10.1007/s12008-010-0089-1

Cited by 21 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Several authors have developed VAPs using different assembly techniques, such as feature matching recognition (Iacob et al, 2011;Sato et al, 2011), constrained based modelling Gutiérrez et al, 2010;Tching et al, 2010), PBM (Gupta et al, 1997;Lim et al, 2007;Garbaya and Zaldivar-Colado, 2009;Chamaret et al, 2010;Aleotti and Caselli, 2011;Xia et al, 2012), import of CAD assembly constraints (Jayaram et al, 1999;Chen et al, 2010;Cheng-jun et al, 2010), and the use of haptics (Ritchie et al, 2008b;Bordegoni et al, 2009;Ladeveze et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2010;Ji et al, 2011;Christiand and Yoon, 2011). Some of these systems are summarized in Table I.…”

Section: Virtual Assembly Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Oriented to assembly sequence planning; optimal assembly algorithm for haptic guidance (Hassan and Yoon, 2010) Single Phantom Omni CAD-to-VR Human scale virtual environment; study the effects of haptic feedback in virtual assembly (Chamaret et al, 2010) SPIDAR, one hand IMA-VR Virtual training; combines haptic, gestures and visual feedback; parts with dynamic behaviour (Gutié rrez et al, 2010) Phantom Omni, LHIfAM or GRAB…”

Section: Mad Simulatormentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A new methodology to evaluate the performance of physics simulation engines in haptic virtual assembly

González-Badillo

Medellín-Castillo

Lim

et al. 2014

Assembly Automation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

is an open access repository that collects the work of Arts et Métiers ParisTech researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible.This is an author-deposited version published in: http://sam.ensam.eu Handle ID: .http://hdl.handle.net/10985/10027 To cite this version :Germanico GONZALEZ-BADILLO, Hugo I. MEDELLIN-CASTILLO, Theodore LIM, James M. RITCHIE, Raymond C.W. SUNG, Samir GARBAYA -A new methodology to evaluate the performance of physics simulation engines in haptic virtual assembly -Assembly AutomationVol. 34, n°2, p.128-140 -2014 Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the repository Administrator : archiveouverte@ensam.eu Assembly AutomationA new methodology to evaluate the performance of physics simulation engines in haptic virtual assembly Germanico Gonzalez-Badillo Hugo I. Medellin-Castillo Theodore Lim James M. Ritchie Raymond C.W. Sung Samir Garbaya Article information:To cite this document: Germanico Gonzalez-Badillo Hugo I. Medellin-Castillo Theodore Lim James M. Ritchie Raymond C.W. Sung Samir Garbaya , Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:Germanico Gonzalez-Badillo, Hugo Medellin-Castillo, Theodore Lim, James Ritchie, Samir Garbaya, (2014),"The development of a physics and constraint-based haptic virtual assembly system", Assembly Automation, Vol. Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by All users group For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.*Related content and download information correct at time of download. Abstract Purpose -In this study, a new methodology to evaluate the performance of physics simulation engines (PSEs) when used in haptic virtual assembly applications is proposed. This methodology can be used to assess the performance of any physics engine. To prove the feasibility of the proposed methodology, two-third party PSEs -Bullet and PhysXtm -were evaluated. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach -Eight assembly tests comprising variable geometric and dynamic complexity were conducted. The strengths and weaknesses of each simulation engine for haptic virtual assembly were identified by measuring different parameters such as task completion time, influence of...

show abstract

Section: Virtual Assembly Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Mad Simulatormentioning

confidence: 99%

A new methodology to evaluate the performance of physics simulation engines in haptic virtual assembly

González-Badillo

Medellín-Castillo

Lim

et al. 2014

Assembly Automation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Haptic interface, as a promising 3D HCI for various applications, could allow the user to feel the contact force in the process of free-form design and more realistically convey virtual reality to humans so as to aid the design process [110][111][112]. To construct more immersive design environments for users, Damien Chamaret [113] and Simon Kind [114] combined haptic and VR in multimodal systems and found that haptic feedback can provide a more accurate manipulation of virtual objects and significantly improve the working efficiency of CAD systems. On this basis, a novel multimodal application, "VRSolid", was proposed by Mogan [73], further extending the input modalities within the VR environment.…”

Section: Other Interfaces For Cadmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, the improvement of user performance associated with task repetitions was used to evaluate learnability in [113], including the task completion time and number of collisions. Meanwhile, Chu et al [117] focused on the number of design steps for modeling and the idle time period when the user knows exactly what to do and is planning how the interaction approach may be performed to achieve the design tasks.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Multimodal Natural Human–Computer Interfaces for Computer-Aided Design: A Review Paper

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Computer-aided design (CAD) systems have advanced to become a critical tool in product design. Nevertheless, they still primarily rely on the traditional mouse and keyboard interface. This limits the naturalness and intuitiveness of the 3D modeling process. Recently, a multimodal human–computer interface (HCI) has been proposed as the next-generation interaction paradigm. Widening the use of a multimodal HCI provides new opportunities for realizing natural interactions in 3D modeling. In this study, we conducted a literature review of a multimodal HCI for CAD to summarize the state-of-the-art research and establish a solid foundation for future research. We explore and categorize the requirements for natural HCIs and discuss paradigms for their implementation in CAD. Following this, factors to evaluate the system performance and user experience of a natural HCI are summarized and analyzed. We conclude by discussing challenges and key research directions for a natural HCI in product design to inspire future studies.

show abstract

“…Several authors have developed VA systems using different methodologies such as automatic feature matching recognition (Iacob et al, 2011;Sato et al, 2011;Vigano and Osorio-Gó mez, 2012;Xu et al, 2012); constrained motion (Tching et al, 2010;Gutiérrez et al, 2010;Xia et al, 2012); reuse of CAD assembly constraints (Jayaram et al, 1999;Chamaret et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2010;Cheng-jun et al, 2010); physics-based modelling (PBM) (Garbaya and Zaldivar-Colado, 2009;Gupta et al, 1997;Aleotti and Caselli, 2011;Wan et al, 2004;Seth et al, 2006;Lim et al, 2007a); hybrid approaches (Seth, 2007;Xia et al, 2011); and the use of haptic feedback (Coutee et al, 2001;Ji et al, 2011;Christiand and Yoon, 2011;Ladeveze et al, 2010;Liu et al, 2010;Bordegoni et al, 2009;Lim et al, 2007a, b). A brief description of the main characteristics of these platforms is presented in Table I.…”

Section: Virtual Assemblymentioning

confidence: 99%

The development of a physics and constraint-based haptic virtual assembly system

González-Badillo

Medellín-Castillo

Lim

et al. 2014

Assembly Automation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -This paper aims to report the development and key features of a novel virtual reality system for assembly planning and evaluation called Haptic Assembly and Manufacturing System (HAMS). The system is intended to be used as a tool for training, design analysis and path planning. Design/methodology/approach -The proposed system uses the physics-based modelling (PBM) to perform assemblies in virtual environments. Moreover, dynamic assembly constrains have been considered to reduce the degrees of freedom of virtual objects and enhance the virtual assembly performance. Findings -To evaluate the effectiveness and performance of HAMS, the assembly of various mechanical components has been carried out, and the results have shown that it can be effectively used to simulate, evaluate, plan and automatically formalise the assembly of complex models in a more natural and intuitive way.Research limitations/implications -The collision detection performance is the bottleneck in any virtual assembly system. New methods of collision shape representation and collision detection algorithms must be considered. Originality/value -HAMS introduces the use of dynamic assembly constraints to enhance the virtual assembly performance. HAMS also uses features not yet reported by similar systems in the literature. These features include: automatic or manual definition of assembly constraints within the virtual assembly system; the implementation of control panels and widgets to modify simulation parameters during running time to evaluate its influence on simulation performance; assembly data logging such as trajectories, forces and update rates for post-processing, further analysis or its presentation in the form of chronocyclegraphs to graphically analyse the assembly process.

show abstract

Integration and evaluation of haptic feedbacks: from CAD models to virtual prototyping

Cited by 21 publications

References 21 publications

A new methodology to evaluate the performance of physics simulation engines in haptic virtual assembly

A new methodology to evaluate the performance of physics simulation engines in haptic virtual assembly

Multimodal Natural Human–Computer Interfaces for Computer-Aided Design: A Review Paper

The development of a physics and constraint-based haptic virtual assembly system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About