International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries

He, Tianwei

doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2043-y

Cited by 106 publications

(83 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…But, as is clear in the Brazilian case, the increase in the amount of products increases the likelihood of citation. Even though these variables might be important, the cluster result reported by different variables indicates the importance of different aspects of interest in the international collaboration with developing countries (He, 2009).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…Collaboration among these countries could have increased over time in more traditional areas of science (biology, chemistry, engineering, clinical and neuroscience) but not necessarily have the same levels of interaction, despite regularizing variables such as language. He (2009) showed how in the case of China this collaboration does not necessarily foster the impact of these publications, which would show other factors such as currents of thinking (main stream) or the interest in social scientific topics as possible mechanisms that stimulate collaboration. However, Bordons et al (1996) showed how in the area of biology different patterns of collaboration can exist.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various studies have tried to characterize the collaboration parameters by regions (Guerrero Bote et al, 2013). Thus, one collaboration analysis between China and other countries demonstrated that while the growth of the number of publications increases among the countries of high economic level, the impact of these publications does not increase in the same way (He, 2009). More comprehensive reports suggest there is a system that favors countries with wider science resources (Leydesdorff & Wagner, 2008).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Psychological Research Collaboration and Visibility in Iberoamerica

López‐López¹,

Anegón²,

Acevedo-Triana³

et al. 2015

Psicol. Reflex. Crit.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The phenomenon of collaboration is an increasing trend in many fields of science, including that of psychology. In Iberoamerican psychology, collaboration occurs on a local and international level. The aim of the study was to evaluate the levels of collaboration in Iberoamerica, using as a baseline the level of worldwide collaboration in psychology in 2012. We collected data from the Scopus database and analyzed it by cluster distribution. Analysis of the sample found within-country collaboration prominent among Iberoamerican psychologists. Findings indicated that in Iberoamerica there is significantly less global collaboration than in other regions, although Iberoamerican scientists are receptive to the idea and acknowledge its potential. Keywords: Scientific production, psychology, collaboration, Iberoamerica Resumo O fenômeno da colaboração é uma tendência em crescimento em muitos campos da ciência, incluindo a psicologia. Na psicologia ibero-americana a colaboração vem ocorrendo em nível regional e internacional. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar níveis de colaboração em Ibero-América, usando como linha de base o nível de colaboração mundial em psicologia nos anos de 2012. Os dados foram coletados da base Scopus e analisado pela distribuição de dados segundo seu grau de agrupamento (cluster). A análise mostrou que a colaboração entre ibero-americanos é maior dentro dos respectivos países e menor em nível global. Mesmo assim, destaque-se que cientistas ibero-americanos são receptivos a ideia de internacionalização e reconheçam seu potencial.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychological Research Collaboration and Visibility in Iberoamerica

López‐López¹,

Anegón²,

Acevedo-Triana³

et al. 2015

Psicol. Reflex. Crit.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…China, Israel, the Netherlands and Switzerland had higher share of internationally collaborated papers. He 9 examined international collaboration of G7 countries with China and found that US was the major collaborator of China among all the G7 countries.…”

Section: Review Of Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Pattern of Collaboration in the Discipline of Japanese Encephalitis

Garg¹,

Dwivedi²

2014

DJLIT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An analysis of 2074 papers indexed by Science Citation Index-Expanded and published by different countries on various aspects of Japanese Encephalitis (JE) during 1991 to 2010 indicates that JE is a highly collaborative discipline as judged by the values of co-authorship index and the collaborative coefficient for different countries and different sub-fields. Of the total published papers, about two-third were written in collaboration. Of these, 214 (10 %) were written with local collaboration, 700 (34 %) with domestic collaboration and 478 (23 %) with international collaboration. Among all the countries, USA is the most important partner country for all the collaborating countries. The study indicates that the share of collaborative papers increased almost four times in 2001-2010 as compared to 1991-2000. USA, Japan, Taiwan and India produced about 70 % of domestically co-authored papers. USA also had the largest number (21 %) of the internationally co-authored articles. Among 17 highly collaborative institutions, the highest (six) are from India, and Liverpool University (UK) had the highest number of internationally collaborative papers, followed by Centre of Disease Control and Prevention (USA).

show abstract

“…The eight major industrialized countries G8, ranked in the top 11 in Table 4, had 59% over the investigation period. Similarly, the seven major industrialized countries G7 the USA, Germany, the UK, Japan, France, Canada, and Italy accounted for a significant proportion exited in many researches (Li et al, 2009;He, 2009;Fu et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2010). The USA dominated, ranking 1 st in independent and collaborative articles, as well as first author and corresponding author articles.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Top 20 Countries/territoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%