Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery &Amp; Data Mining 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3219819.3219904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretable Representation Learning for Healthcare via Capturing Disease Progression through Time

Abstract: Various deep learning models have recently been applied to predictive modeling of Electronic Health Records (EHR). In medical claims data, which is a particular type of EHR data, each patient is represented as a sequence of temporally ordered irregularly sampled visits to health providers, where each visit is recorded as an unordered set of medical codes specifying patient’s diagnosis and treatment provided during the visit. Based on the observation that different patient conditions have different temporal pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
95
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, several researches have also explored the interpretability in the medical-feature-level. Timeline (Bai et al 2018) utilizes self-attention to generate clinical visit embedding, but can only identify disease codelevel importance. Some researches show the importance of features via adversarial attack, which is not an end-toend framework (Sun et al 2018).…”
Section: Interpretability Of Emr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, several researches have also explored the interpretability in the medical-feature-level. Timeline (Bai et al 2018) utilizes self-attention to generate clinical visit embedding, but can only identify disease codelevel importance. Some researches show the importance of features via adversarial attack, which is not an end-toend framework (Sun et al 2018).…”
Section: Interpretability Of Emr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it will also remind the physicians of the previously unknown correlation between the biomarker and death reason. However, most of the existing works can only provide visit-level or disease-feature-level interpretability by attention mechanism (Ma et al 2017;Bai et al 2018). As far as we know, RETAIN (Choi et al 2016) is the only work that can provide reasonable biomarker-feature-level interpretability by utilizing twolevel attention as an end-to-end model, but its prediction accuracy is unsatisfactory (Ma, Xiao, and Wang 2018;Ma et al 2018a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng et al balance the inheritance and update of hidden states based on the time decay function when updating the hidden layer state of GRU [11]. Bai et al propose the Timeline model to model the decay rate of different events affecting patients [9]. These efforts use time decay factors to solve inconsistencies in clinical event sequences but do not consider the short-term out-of-order in clinical event sequence in EHR data.…”
Section: B Deep Sequential Models For Ehrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, considering the particular condition of the patient, the way of attending the medical features in the whole prediction process should be individualized. Some existing works try to model the relationship between clinical visits (Ma et al 2017), dynamic features (Bai et al 2018;Choi et al 2016) or incorporate the static information (Lee et al 2018). However, none of the existing models explored the interdependencies among dynamic records as well as static baseline information via a global view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, medical records are produced irregularly in clinical practice. It is assumed by many existing works (Pham et al 2016;Baytas et al 2017;Ma, Xiao, and Wang 2018;Bai et al 2018) that the more recent clinical records weight more than previous records in general on the healthcare prediction. However, under certain circumstance, historical records also contain valuable clinical information, which may not be revealed in the latest record (e.g., the blood glucose level was extremely abnormal).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%