2011
DOI: 10.1029/2010gc003381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of porosity and LWD resistivity from the Nankai accretionary wedge in light of clay physicochemical properties: Evidence for erosion and local overpressuring

Abstract: [1] In this study, we used porosity to assess the compaction state of the Nankai accretionary wedge sediments and any implications for stress and pore pressure. However, hydrous minerals affect porosity measurements, and accounting for them is essential toward defining the interstitial porosity truly representative of the compaction state. The water content of sediments was measured in core samples and estimated from logging data using a resistivity model for shale. We used the cation exchange capacity to cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
79
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(7) is often used to predict conductivities in marine sediment, and can be used here to anticipate the measured conductivity drop as the probe passes from the salt water surrounding the specimen and into the sediment itself. Taking s f ¼ 3.09 S/m as measured for the pressurizing water via a YSI conductivity meter, and the Archie parameters a ¼ 1 and either m ¼ 2e2.4 from IODP studies of the Nankai Trough (Conin et al, 2011; or m~2 based on estimates for hydrate-bearing sediments (Spangenberg, 2001), the predicted s s for core 8P, with a measured porosity, n, of~0.49, is 0.56e0.74 S/m. For core 10P, with a measured porosity n of~0.46, the anticipated specimen s s is 0.48e0.66 S/m.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(7) is often used to predict conductivities in marine sediment, and can be used here to anticipate the measured conductivity drop as the probe passes from the salt water surrounding the specimen and into the sediment itself. Taking s f ¼ 3.09 S/m as measured for the pressurizing water via a YSI conductivity meter, and the Archie parameters a ¼ 1 and either m ¼ 2e2.4 from IODP studies of the Nankai Trough (Conin et al, 2011; or m~2 based on estimates for hydrate-bearing sediments (Spangenberg, 2001), the predicted s s for core 8P, with a measured porosity, n, of~0.49, is 0.56e0.74 S/m. For core 10P, with a measured porosity n of~0.46, the anticipated specimen s s is 0.48e0.66 S/m.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Site C0008 results showed the utility of using the ages of MTDs to reconstruct slope failure activity and to relate it to megasplay fault movements (Strasser et al, 2009). Apart from the deepest section, Site C0008 lacks clear evidence for MTDs because of a significant hia-tus, suggesting erosion related to a prominent slope collapse structure seaward of the megasplay fault (Strasser et al, 2011;Conin et al, 2011). Site C0018 is located within a lower slope basin that (1) better represents the depocenter for downslope mass transport, (2) is clearly characterized by stacked MTDs as seismically imaged by acoustically transparent to chaotic bodies with ponded geometries (Fig.…”
Section: Background and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water bound to the hydrated minerals is a function of the number of cations present between the layers of hydrated minerals [Ransom and Hegelson, 1994]. The number of cations can be obtained from cation exchange capacity (CEC) measurements [Henry, 1997;Bourlange et al, 2003;Conin et al, 2008]. The effective porosity (' e ) is expressed as…”
Section: Calibration Of Brie Equations For Clays From Iodp Site C0009mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where a and m are chosen to equal 1 and 2, respectively, based on those computed for similar sediments drilled in the fore-arc basin at IODP Site C0002 [Conin et al, 2008]. The resistivity of the invaded zone is measured with the wireline MCFL™ tool, but unfortunately poor borehole conditions prevent its use in Unit IV.…”
Section: Reliability Of the Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%