Intervenir sur les TMS

Buchmann, Willy; Landry, Aurélie

doi:10.4000/activites.2418

Cited by 12 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The psychosocial workload, however, also contributes to MSD risk, as shown by Bourgeois and colleagues (2000), Daniellou (2011) andGrenier-Pezé (2003). By focusing on the individual worker, and the mechanical stress on body tissues caused by various tasks, particularly their repetitiveness, intensity, duration and stress, we may end up ignoring the collective and organizational dimensions of work (Buchmann & Landry, 2010, St Vincent et al, 2011. If a model considers only the external physical workload, it will poorly represent the daily on-the-job experience that develops through the social and subjective history of workers.…”

Section: Subjective Experience In the Operators' Assessment Of Msd Ri...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing MSDs before Introduction of a Cobot: Psychosocial Aspects and Employee’s Subjective Experience

Cippelletti

Azouaghe

Pellier

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are one of the main causes of work disability (EU-OSHA, 2019; WHO, 2019). Several solutions, including the cobotic system (EUROGIP, 2017), have been put forward to improve unhealthy working conditions and prevent MSDs. We sought to identify the MSD risk factors of workers on a screen-printed glass production line prior to introduction of a cobot. We used a mixed data collection technique: video observations and assessment of MSD risk factors by expert ergonomists, and then self-confrontation interviews with six production-line operators and subjective perception of risk factors. The two types of assessment (by experts and by operators) showed that the most demanding risk factors were physical (e.g., work posture) and psychosocial (e.g., mental workload). Certain risk factors were viewed differently by the experts and the operators. One question remains: How can a cobot make work more meaningful for operators?

show abstract

Section: Subjective Experience In the Operators' Assessment Of Msd Ri...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing MSDs before Introduction of a Cobot: Psychosocial Aspects and Employee’s Subjective Experience

Cippelletti

Azouaghe

Pellier

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Contributions of Ergonomics to the Development of Prevention Projects: The Role of Intermediate Prevention Objects

Garrigou

Judon

Galey

2018

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Toward a Better Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Nanoparticles Taking into Account Work Activities

Galey

Audignon

Witschger

et al. 2018

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intervenir sur les TMS

Abstract: Intervenir sur les TMS Un modèle des Troubles Musculo-squelettiques comme objet intermédiaire entre ergonomes et acteurs de l'entreprise ? Preventing musculoskeletal disorders. Can an MSD model be used as an intermediary object between ergonomists and company actors ?

Cited by 12 publications

References 6 publications

Assessing MSDs before Introduction of a Cobot: Psychosocial Aspects and Employee’s Subjective Experience

Assessing MSDs before Introduction of a Cobot: Psychosocial Aspects and Employee’s Subjective Experience

Contributions of Ergonomics to the Development of Prevention Projects: The Role of Intermediate Prevention Objects

Toward a Better Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Nanoparticles Taking into Account Work Activities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About