2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.11.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of critical failures using root cause analysis methods: Case study of ASH cement PLC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of engineering failure analysis approaches to investigate probable/possible root causes of failures are quite common in literature, most notably the use of popular techniques such as fault tree analysis (FTA) and reliability block diagrams (RBDs) to model failures. A study by [20] employed these techniques (i.e., FTA and RBD) to detect the causal factors, as well as their interrelations for a chronic cement plant rotary kiln refractory brick failure, so as to provide detailed dimension of vulnerabilities in maintenance, operations, and quality practices. While [21] and [22] also used both FTA and RBD techniques for analysing historic engineering catastrophes such as Fukushima nuclear disaster (2011), BP Texas city incident (2005), NASA's space shuttle Columbia accident (2003), Chernobyl disaster (1986), Bhopal disaster (1984), and sinking of the Titanic Ocean liner (1912).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The use of engineering failure analysis approaches to investigate probable/possible root causes of failures are quite common in literature, most notably the use of popular techniques such as fault tree analysis (FTA) and reliability block diagrams (RBDs) to model failures. A study by [20] employed these techniques (i.e., FTA and RBD) to detect the causal factors, as well as their interrelations for a chronic cement plant rotary kiln refractory brick failure, so as to provide detailed dimension of vulnerabilities in maintenance, operations, and quality practices. While [21] and [22] also used both FTA and RBD techniques for analysing historic engineering catastrophes such as Fukushima nuclear disaster (2011), BP Texas city incident (2005), NASA's space shuttle Columbia accident (2003), Chernobyl disaster (1986), Bhopal disaster (1984), and sinking of the Titanic Ocean liner (1912).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its usefulness, RBDs have been criticised for their overreliance on near perfect (which is often unrealistic in all circumstances, especially when dealing with unfamiliar problems) FT outputs in order to generate accurate results [22]. Detailed and clear guidelines for constructing RBDs, as well as their conversion to FTs and vice versa are available in [21], while [20] further demonstrates real-life implementations. Typical RBD symbols and their associated interpretations are provided in Table 2.…”
Section: Overview Of Reliability Block Diagram Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods have been commonly used to evaluate the product failure such as FMEA [6,[8][9][10], fault tree analysis (FTA) [11][12][13], and root cause analysis [14][15][16]. This study used FMEA to evaluate the potential failure of sugarcane machine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 already provided a brief description of the main classes of maintenance strategies and their individual characteristics. While knowledge about the different types of maintenance philosophies (i.e., BM, PPM and CBM) is widely available within literature [16,[53][54][55], their relationships/influence on each other is often neglected. In this section, a very brief overview of each of the popular maintenance philosophies is revisited but with emphasis on the impacts they have on one another and the overall maintenance workload which is vital for MAM planning.…”
Section: Maintenance Regimes and Their Interdependencementioning
confidence: 99%