1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022552126239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Above 1.95 K, there is some remaining hysteresis in the prewetting transitions, but not in the position of the KT line. Prewetting is in the two-dimensional Ising universality class, and the phase transitions in this type of system are well known to be strongly affected by disorder, [31][32][33][34] while the KT transition, which is in the XY universality class, is relatively insensitive to disorder. 35 The junction in the -T plane of the first-order prewetting line and the higher-order KT line shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above 1.95 K, there is some remaining hysteresis in the prewetting transitions, but not in the position of the KT line. Prewetting is in the two-dimensional Ising universality class, and the phase transitions in this type of system are well known to be strongly affected by disorder, [31][32][33][34] while the KT transition, which is in the XY universality class, is relatively insensitive to disorder. 35 The junction in the -T plane of the first-order prewetting line and the higher-order KT line shown in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference implies that the L c , at which length scale the spanning probability vanishes, scales as L c ∼ L 6 b . The L b is already exponentially large length scale for small ∆, so L c should be large enough that one can be below it in experiments, and thus a system can "apparently percolate" [36,10].…”
Section: Percolation With An External Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], the relation ρ 3 ∝ ρ 1.75±0.05 1 was obtained numerically (for a rectangular distribution of random fields), however, an exponent 2 can also be reconciled with their figure 4, when the smaller slope in the lower part of the plot is ascribed to finite-size effects. In [19], the relation…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%