2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Job satisfaction and intention to quit: A bibliometric review of work-family conflict and research agenda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
1
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A three fields plot depicts how the existing authors are citing their extant research work in many prestigious journals on key research areas identified in this study. The three field plot helps in pinpointing the entire study in one figure and demonstrates the relationship between the contents (Mumu et al, 2020). The names of the authors are being demonstrated in the left of this study, key research themes in center and valuable journal sources in the right.…”
Section: The Most Productive Authors Abstract Used and Sources Of Publicationmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A three fields plot depicts how the existing authors are citing their extant research work in many prestigious journals on key research areas identified in this study. The three field plot helps in pinpointing the entire study in one figure and demonstrates the relationship between the contents (Mumu et al, 2020). The names of the authors are being demonstrated in the left of this study, key research themes in center and valuable journal sources in the right.…”
Section: The Most Productive Authors Abstract Used and Sources Of Publicationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Although there were some papers on this topic that focused on definite sectors like knowledge management and sustainability, higher education, etc., this study for the first time, to the best of the authors' knowledge, applies bibliometric study in the integration of knowledge in education literature (Figure 1). This study adopts a systematic document (sample) selection process which first collects all relevant articles and sequentially filters them to pin-point the objective areas of a study similar to earlier studies (Mumu, Tahmid, & Azad, 2020). Before starting the search option, this study selected only Web of Science (WoS) database considering its reputation as a depository of high impactful documents since 1950 (Archambault et al, 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Social Structure was evaluated by the world map of collaborations for which at least one collaboration among the authors from different countries (Aria and Cuccurullo 2017 ). The Conceptual Framework was evaluated by thematic mapping, which allows the visualization of four different types of themes based on density, i.e., the strength of the internal links among all of the keywords used to describe the research topic, concurrently with the centrality and the strength of the external links with other themes, hence investigating the authors' keyword field (Aria and Cuccurullo 2017 ; Mumu et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fruiting phase varies in different regions of Brazil, including on the coast of the Northeast. There are two fruiting phases (winter—May to July or July to October; and summer—January to April or December to April) (Oliveira and Aloufa 2020 ). However, in the Cerrado Biome, fruits can also be collected throughout the year (Campos et al 2018 ); in the Midwest, only one collection per year is reported (from October to May) (Campos et al 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several types of systematic review are available in the literature: structured review which examines most applied methods, theories and constructs (Dhaliwal et al., 2020; Paul & Singh, 2017; Rosado‐Serrano et al., 2018); review for model/framework development (Paul, 2019; Paul & Mas, 2019); meta‐analysis (Knoll & Matthes, 2017; Rana & Paul, 2020); reviews based on theory (Paul & Rosado‐Serrano, 2019); hybrid reviews (Kumar et al., 2019; Paul et al., 2017); framework‐based reviews (Paul & Benito, 2018); and bibliometric reviews (Mumu et al., 2020; Pattnaik et al., 2020; Randhawa et al., 2016; Subramanyam, 1983). This study adopts a hybrid review (bibliometric and 4W framework) to provide the most comprehensive review of IM literature (Paul & Criado, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%