Justification of the Optimal Composition of the Air Defense Troops Grouping

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of determining the number of antiaircraft missile systems of various types in grouping of Air Defense troops for the purpose of providing the required effectiveness of repelling the enemy air strikes on the objects and troops. The methodology of justification of ratio of different types of antiaircraft missile systems in the grouping of Air Defense troops using Lagrange’s method of undetermined multipliers has been developed. This technique allows justifying a set of types of antiaircraft missile systems which will provide maximum effectiveness of the employment of grouping of Air Defense troops. This approach can also be used to justify the composition of mixed military formations of Air Defense.

Development of the survivability indicators forecasting method of the special-purpose system executive element based on analytical and stochastic simulation of a conflict situation

“…The proposed method, in comparison with the considered approaches [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], provides an increase (gain) in the reliability of forecasting the survivability indicator (18) within certain hypotheses and assumptions by an average of 22 %, and the average deviation of the values is reduced by 17 %.…”

“…There is a need to substantiate additional hypotheses and assumptions, which requires additional study of the adequacy to the real process. [11] discusses the method of determining the number of groups of heterogeneous elements in the executive system to ensure the necessary effectiveness of repelling enemy attacks on objects and troops using the Lagrange multiplier method. This method allows justifying a set of elements that will ensure maximum performance of the executive system.…”

“…The analysis of the works [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] allows asserting that the existing scientific achievements do not fully provide for forecasting the dynamics of changes in stochastic survivability indicators over time. The described modeling methods only partially describe the relationship between survivability and efficiency indicators and do not provide their evaluation in the dynamics of relevant events.…”

Method of the Effort Coordination Chart Creation

“…The effectiveness of air defense (AD) is largely determined by the degree of AD Plan implementation at all levels from a single unit to a group of troops as a whole [1]. One of the most important components of operatioal planning is the organization of interaction, i.e.…”

“…One of the most important components of operatioal planning is the organization of interaction, i.e. coordination of forces actions which jointly carry out the same missions, and the document developed for this purpose is the efforts coordination chart (ECC) which is intended for forces actions coordination by missions, time and directions (area) during operations [1]. In modern conditions of operations, the most difficult is to coordinate the actions of air and ground components of troops (forces), examples of which are fighter aircraft (AD Aircraft) and anti-aircraft missile systems of anti-aircraft missile forces (GBAD), performing joint missions in air defense system (AD system).…”