2015
DOI: 10.14361/9783839420881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kapitalistische Geister in der Kultur- und Kreativwirtschaft

Abstract: Künstlerisch-kreative Arbeit wird auf politischer Ebene gern als moderne und zeitgemäße Arbeits- und Wirtschaftsform beansprucht. Die Wissenschaft hingegen schreibt ihr vielfach eine paradigmatische Kulturbedeutung im neuen Kapitalismus zu. Doch sind Kreative überhaupt eine geeignete soziale Gruppe, um solche weitreichenden Schlüsse zu ziehen? Diese Studie betrachtet die bisher kaum untersuchten Arbeitsverhältnisse in der Modedesign- sowie in der Kommunikationsbranche und geht der Frage nach, ob sich die kapi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are several shortcomings in such cultural explanations. Much research on precarity-as-choice mainly focuses on the creative sector, such as culture workers (Manske, 2015), musicians (Umney and Kretsos, 2015), artists and non-governmental organisation (NGO) workers or knowledge workers (Armano and Murgia, 2017), who are driven by their passion for their profession which is often considered much easier to develop under flexible working arrangements. The research demonstrates that managing precarity even among a narrow category of creative workers is by no means automatic and requires much identity work and an ability to cultivate holding environments in the absence of stable work organisation (Petriglieri, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Experiencing Precarity: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there are several shortcomings in such cultural explanations. Much research on precarity-as-choice mainly focuses on the creative sector, such as culture workers (Manske, 2015), musicians (Umney and Kretsos, 2015), artists and non-governmental organisation (NGO) workers or knowledge workers (Armano and Murgia, 2017), who are driven by their passion for their profession which is often considered much easier to develop under flexible working arrangements. The research demonstrates that managing precarity even among a narrow category of creative workers is by no means automatic and requires much identity work and an ability to cultivate holding environments in the absence of stable work organisation (Petriglieri, et al, 2019).…”
Section: Experiencing Precarity: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there is an emerging body of work that argues precarity is not perceived by those affected as problematic (see Bove et al, 2017; Manske, 2015; Umney and Kretsos, 2015). In the existing studies on young precarious workers, two ways of explaining their acceptance of precarity seem to dominate: cultural and generational.…”
Section: Experiencing Precarity: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The new cultural economy has been of keen interest to scholars since the Millennium, and Berlin has attracted a good deal of attention, especially from cultural and economic geographers (see, among many others, Jakob 2009, Colomb 2012, Lange 2012. But only a handful of studies consider fashion as part of these often intersecting urban 'scenes' comprising predominantly music and club culture, graphic design, artists and curators, and the emerging tech sector, many of which converged not only in the city's famous nightclubs (Berghain, Tresor) but also in the growing spread of co-working spaces (see Kalandides 2014, Manske 2015. Of course, Berlin is a smaller city than London and not part of the global high-fashion city map.…”
Section: Berlin: a New Social Fashion Imaginary?mentioning
confidence: 99%