“…Because of considering them basic competences for the human being, they are dimensioned in: (a) adaptation of the text, (b) cohesion and coherence in the organization of ideas, (c) use of conventional language systems, (e) reflection and continuous assessment. Some evidence in this regard shows that all dimensions must be developed at the same time, because they must be understood as concatenated elements, avoiding considering them as progressive levels (Atasoy & Temiskan, 2016), as well as, it has been found that if there are problems for control and develop basic skills, then the higher ones would present similar problems from the school stage (Díaz, 2018), especially in subsidized schools. On the contrary, given the need for students to develop these dimensions in parallel, we find evidence that contradicts these proposals, since it has been found that the major problem lies in the transfer of written content to another language, and in the capitalization of the text (generation of macro ideas) (Ratnaningsih, 2019), instead of the competences of cohesion, coherence, adequacy and reflection, although in the Latin American evidence there are coincidences on the parallel education of the dimensions of written expression (Atasoy & Temiskan, 2016;Sánchez & López, 2019).…”