2006
DOI: 10.1002/bem.20196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lack of direct DNA damage in human blood leukocytes and lymphocytes after in vitro exposure to high power microwave pulses

Abstract: Currently, the potential genotoxicity of high power microwave pulses (HPMP) is not clear. Using the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay, also known as the alkaline comet assay, we studied the effects of HPMP (8.8 GHz, 180 ns pulse width, peak power 65 kW, pulse repetition frequency 50 Hz) on DNA of human whole-blood leukocytes and isolated lymphocytes. The cell suspensions were exposed to HPMP for 40 min in a rectangular waveguide. The average SAR calculated from the temperature kinetics was about 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vijayalaxmi et al (2006) suggested that the observations reported in the REFLEX studies may have resulted from small differences in the incidence of apoptosis/proliferating cells among the samples, rather than from induction of DNA damage. In contrast to the studies just described, most in vitro studies failed to detect any evidence of primary DNA damage in a variety of mammalian cell lines exposed to RF fields (Hook et al, 2004;Zeni et al, 2005;Stronati et al, 2006;Sakuma et al, 2006;Chemeris et al, 2006). Several recent studies also failed to observe increased DNA damage in a variety of cells/tissues harvested from animals exposed to a range of RF field frequencies and intensities (Aitken et al, 2005;Belyaev et al, 2006;Verschaeve et al, 2006).…”
Section: Genetic Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Vijayalaxmi et al (2006) suggested that the observations reported in the REFLEX studies may have resulted from small differences in the incidence of apoptosis/proliferating cells among the samples, rather than from induction of DNA damage. In contrast to the studies just described, most in vitro studies failed to detect any evidence of primary DNA damage in a variety of mammalian cell lines exposed to RF fields (Hook et al, 2004;Zeni et al, 2005;Stronati et al, 2006;Sakuma et al, 2006;Chemeris et al, 2006). Several recent studies also failed to observe increased DNA damage in a variety of cells/tissues harvested from animals exposed to a range of RF field frequencies and intensities (Aitken et al, 2005;Belyaev et al, 2006;Verschaeve et al, 2006).…”
Section: Genetic Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, partial studies hold a reverse idea that microwave radiation has little hereditary toxicity, for example long‐term exposure (2 h/day, 5 days/week for 2 years) of rats to 900 MHz GSM signal at 0.3 and 0.9 W/kg did not significantly affect DNA strand breaks in cells (Verschaeve et al., ). Chemeris' results were exactly the same, high‐power microwave under the given exposure conditions did not induce DNA strand breaks, alkali‐labile sites and incomplete excision repair sites of human whole‐blood leucocytes and isolated lymphocytes exposed to 8.8‐GHz field at SAR of 1.6 kW/kg for 40 min and 30 min, respectively (Chemeris et al., ). Further studies are needed to evaluate the genotoxic effects of an ordinary mobile phone radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Thus nervous tissue appeared to be sensitive to HPPM [Pakhomov and Doyle, ; Pakhomov et al, ,]. In cellular studies, Chemeris et al [] showed no effect of HPPM on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) integrity or cell morphology in erythrocytes and white blood cells exposed to multiple 8.8 GHz, 180‐ns pulses at 50 Hz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%