2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.11.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral guidance and control of UAVs using second-order sliding modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) The constant parameters of the two compared tracking control approaches are given in Table 2. (2); γ α (3) 140; 20; 15 γ α (4); γ α (5); γ α (6) 80; 20; 10 γ µ (1); γ µ (2); γ µ (3) 178; 145; 110 γ µ (4); γ µ (5); γ µ (6) 64; 92; 80 γ η (1); γ η (2); γ η (3) 70; 20; 25 γ η (4); γ η (5); γ η (6) 65; 10; 5 γ g (1); γ g (2) 0.0011; 0.0014 0.0011; 0.0014 γ g (3); γ g (4) 0.0016; 0.0012 0.0016; 0.0012 γ g (5); γ g (6) 0.0015; 0.0015 0.0015; 0.0015 In comparison with the CMTC, the PTCM shows the best tracking control performance. This superiority of the PTCM in ensuring the desired objective of control despite unknown dynamics, parameter variations, unknown disturbances, and unknown physical parameters of the studied quadrotor is due to both of its features, namely (1) optimal estimation of unknown dynamics, and (2) a great efficiency in rejecting all disturbances that influence the system robustness.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) The constant parameters of the two compared tracking control approaches are given in Table 2. (2); γ α (3) 140; 20; 15 γ α (4); γ α (5); γ α (6) 80; 20; 10 γ µ (1); γ µ (2); γ µ (3) 178; 145; 110 γ µ (4); γ µ (5); γ µ (6) 64; 92; 80 γ η (1); γ η (2); γ η (3) 70; 20; 25 γ η (4); γ η (5); γ η (6) 65; 10; 5 γ g (1); γ g (2) 0.0011; 0.0014 0.0011; 0.0014 γ g (3); γ g (4) 0.0016; 0.0012 0.0016; 0.0012 γ g (5); γ g (6) 0.0015; 0.0015 0.0015; 0.0015 In comparison with the CMTC, the PTCM shows the best tracking control performance. This superiority of the PTCM in ensuring the desired objective of control despite unknown dynamics, parameter variations, unknown disturbances, and unknown physical parameters of the studied quadrotor is due to both of its features, namely (1) optimal estimation of unknown dynamics, and (2) a great efficiency in rejecting all disturbances that influence the system robustness.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, several robust approaches have been proposed for the control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), most of which use intelligent and robust control approaches such as fuzzy logic control (FLC), the H∞ technique, sliding mode control (SMC), the backstepping technique, and adaptive control [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. The quadrotor is among the most popular UAVs and is widely used in many applications such as surveillance, air mapping, inspection, aerial cinematography, rescue missions, search missions in hostile environments, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the authors, it presents a good performance in the presence of wind and parametric uncertainty. In [7] the controller presented in [72] is improved by implementing a Partially-IGC strategy that includes a sliding mode control on the inner and the outer loops using a non-linear sliding surface based on Second Order Sliding Mode (SOSM ) control theory. Experimental tests compare the conventional SGC approach and the proposed Partially-IGC approach to show that the second one presents a faster convergence of the cross-track error toward zero.…”
Section: Sliding Mode Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is reputed by its effectiveness to control dynamic systems, notably HOSMs [7], [8] which ensure a finite time convergence and reduce chattering which is the principal inconvenient of the SM controllers [9], [10]. In aircraft control, most of the works that use HOSM focus on the Second Order Sliding Mode (SOSM) [11], [12]. Among them, we cite STW algorithm that is reputed for its robustness and finite time convergence [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%