2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2023
DOI: 10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning to Predict Action Feasibility for Task and Motion Planning in 3D Environments

Abstract: In Task and motion planning (TAMP), symbolic search is combined with continuous geometric planning. A task planner finds an action sequence while a motion planner checks its feasibility and plans the corresponding sequence of motions. However, due to the high combinatorial complexity of discrete search, the number of calls to the geometric planner can be very large. Previous works [1] [2] leverage learning methods to efficiently predict the feasibility of actions, much like humans do, on tabletop scenarios. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In deterministic sampling-based motion planning, if no plan is found, then either no solution exists or a solution exists only through some narrow passages [28]- [31]. Previous works have also proposed learning-based methods to predict infeasible plans [32]- [36]. All of these methods do not provide exact plan non-existence guarantees.…”
Section: A Infeasibility Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In deterministic sampling-based motion planning, if no plan is found, then either no solution exists or a solution exists only through some narrow passages [28]- [31]. Previous works have also proposed learning-based methods to predict infeasible plans [32]- [36]. All of these methods do not provide exact plan non-existence guarantees.…”
Section: A Infeasibility Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%