Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator type methods for the identification of serum biomarkers of overweight and obesity: simulation and application

Abstract

BackgroundThe study of circulating biomarkers and their association with disease outcomes has become progressively complex due to advances in the measurement of these biomarkers through multiplex technologies. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) is a data analysis method that may be utilized for biomarker selection in these high dimensional data. However, it is unclear which LASSO-type method is preferable when considering data scenarios that may be present in serum biomarker research, such as high correlation between biomarkers, weak associations with the outcome, and sparse number of true signals. The goal of this study was to compare the LASSO to five LASSO-type methods given these scenarios.MethodsA simulation study was performed to compare the LASSO, Adaptive LASSO, Elastic Net, Iterated LASSO, Bootstrap-Enhanced LASSO, and Weighted Fusion for the binary logistic regression model. The simulation study was designed to reflect the data structure of the population-based Tucson Epidemiological Study of Airway Obstructive Disease (TESAOD), specifically the sample size (N = 1000 for total population, 500 for sub-analyses), correlation of biomarkers (0.20, 0.50, 0.80), prevalence of overweight (40%) and obese (12%) outcomes, and the association of outcomes with standardized serum biomarker concentrations (log-odds ratio = 0.05–1.75). Each LASSO-type method was then applied to the TESAOD data of 306 overweight, 66 obese, and 463 normal-weight subjects with a panel of 86 serum biomarkers.ResultsBased on the simulation study, no method had an overall superior performance. The Weighted Fusion correctly identified more true signals, but incorrectly included more noise variables. The LASSO and Elastic Net correctly identified many true signals and excluded more noise variables. In the application study, biomarkers of overweight and obesity selected by all methods were Adiponectin, Apolipoprotein H, Calcitonin, CD14, Complement 3, C-reactive protein, Ferritin, Growth Hormone, Immunoglobulin M, Interleukin-18, Leptin, Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1, Myoglobin, Sex Hormone Binding Globulin, Surfactant Protein D, and YKL-40.ConclusionsFor the data scenarios examined, choice of optimal LASSO-type method was data structure dependent and should be guided by the research objective. The LASSO-type methods identified biomarkers that have known associations with obesity and obesity related conditions.

Radiomics Features of Multiparametric MRI as Novel Prognostic Factors in Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

“…For the binary logistic regression model, the residual sum of squares is replaced by the negative log-likelihood. If the l is large, there is no effect on the estimated regression parameters, but as the l gets smaller, some coefficients may be shrunk towards zero (29,30). We then selected the l for which the cross-validation error is the smallest.…”

Radiomics Nomogram Building From Multiparametric MRI to Predict Grade in Patients With Glioma: A Cohort Study

“…Hence, the dimensions presented by these quantitative features needed to be reduced by prioritizing the features . Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) is a popular high‐dimensional data analysis method that can be used to improve both prediction accuracy and interpretation . Therefore, LASSO was used in this study to select the most useful prediction features in glioma grading from the training cohort.…”

“…Therefore, LASSO was used in this study to select the most useful prediction features in glioma grading from the training cohort. This approach can estimate the regression coefficients for every feature and successively shrink them to avoid inflation of the estimated coefficients, resulting in superior predictive performance . It can minimize the residual sum of squares, subject to the sum of the absolute value of the coefficients being less than a tuning parameter (λ) .…”

“…If this λ is large, there is no effect on the estimated regression parameters. However, if λ gets smaller, this may cause some coefficients to be shrunk towards zero or set to be zero . Thus, the λ selection in our study was used as a 10‐fold crossvalidation via minimum criteria.…”

Intracranial Pressure Forecasting in Children Using Dynamic Averaging of Time Series Data

“…This regression is based on the shrinkage estimation, and it is a popular tool for the analysis of a high-dimensional dataset such as ours. The advantages of Lasso include: (1) a smaller Mean Squared Error (MSE) compared to the conventional methods; (2) handling the multicollinearity problems more efficiently; (3) weighting the features reliably; and (4) shrinking coefficients [20][21][22].…”