2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lecturer perceptions of im/politeness and in/appropriateness in student e-mail requests: A Norwegian perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Ho (2018), previous studies investigating requests in CMC context have paid so much attention to the interaction between EFL learners and faculty, which are especially concerned with the use of pragmatic politeness in students' requests through emails sent to their faculty. These studies, according to Ho's (2018) classification, mainly discuss (a) the pragmatic failure illustrated by the students (e.g., Chejnova, 2014; Economidou-Kogetsidis, 2011); (b) the way students' use of politeness could influence faculty's perception of the students' personality (Economidou-Kogetsidis, 2016) and of the (im)politeness and (in)appropriateness of the emails (Savic, 2018); and (c) the type and quantity of resources students used when they wrote polite emails, reinforcing the necessity to pedagogically intervene in the acquisition of pragmatic politeness (Biesenbach-Lucas, 2007).…”
Section: Request and Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ho (2018), previous studies investigating requests in CMC context have paid so much attention to the interaction between EFL learners and faculty, which are especially concerned with the use of pragmatic politeness in students' requests through emails sent to their faculty. These studies, according to Ho's (2018) classification, mainly discuss (a) the pragmatic failure illustrated by the students (e.g., Chejnova, 2014; Economidou-Kogetsidis, 2011); (b) the way students' use of politeness could influence faculty's perception of the students' personality (Economidou-Kogetsidis, 2016) and of the (im)politeness and (in)appropriateness of the emails (Savic, 2018); and (c) the type and quantity of resources students used when they wrote polite emails, reinforcing the necessity to pedagogically intervene in the acquisition of pragmatic politeness (Biesenbach-Lucas, 2007).…”
Section: Request and Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the possible reasons for this situation may be that email is not a suitable communication channel for conveying feelings. As students have contacted their tutors many times to tell their excuses (Savic, 2018;Pinto, 2019), it would not be wrong to say that they have negative feelings. Already, the results of the research showed us that the students tried to convey their feelings to the message, and they received messages that included feelings from the staff.…”
Section: The Problems Encountered By Students In Emails Received From Academic and Administrative Staffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A felsőoktatás e-mailezési gyakorlatainak sajátosságai számos pragmatikai (Hudson 2011;Bachmann 2011;Merrison et al 2012;Danielewicz-Betz 2013;Chejnová 2014;Alsout-Khedri 2019;Savić 2018Savić , 2019, szövegtipológiai (Varga 2019) és szociolingvisztikai kutatást (Hariri 2017) inspirálnak. Az írásbeli online kapcsolattartási forma gyakorisága, az oktatásszervezésben betöltött egyre meghatározóbb szerepei, az így megvalósuló nyelvi cselekvések sokszínűsége, illetve a kultúránként eltérő gyakorlatok összehasonlíthatósága egyaránt motiválják az empirikus kutatások sokaságát.…”
Section: Bevezetésunclassified