2014
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggu199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Line-source simulation for shallow-seismic data. Part 1: theoretical background

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, each seismogram is convolved with t −1∕2 , second, tapered with t −1∕2 , where t is the traveltime, and third, scaled with r ffiffi ffi 2 p where r is the receiver offset. This transformation is introduced by Forbriger et al (2014) as a direct-wave transformation.…”
Section: Comparison Of Field Data With Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, each seismogram is convolved with t −1∕2 , second, tapered with t −1∕2 , where t is the traveltime, and third, scaled with r ffiffi ffi 2 p where r is the receiver offset. This transformation is introduced by Forbriger et al (2014) as a direct-wave transformation.…”
Section: Comparison Of Field Data With Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schäfer et al (2014) show that this simple approach performs surprisingly well in application to elastic waves (including P-, S-, and Rayleighwaves) on a 2D structure, except for backscattered waves. Forbriger et al (2014) provide theoretical reasoning for the applicability to the layered elastic case.…”
Section: Comparison Of Field Data With Simulated Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forbriger et al (2014) show that this approach is also appropriate in the viscoelastic case (both vertical and radial component) for 1-D structures with source and receiver at the free surface.…”
Section: Single-trace Transformations For Non 1-d-structuresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In comparison, 2-D full waveform inversion (FWI) is computationally more efficient, preferential for code development and applications. In particular, Forbriger et al (2014), Schäfer et al (2014), and Groos et al (2017) proposed a stable workflow for 2-D FWI of shallow-seismic Rayleigh waves not only for synthetic data but also for real field-recorded data, in which a 3-D/2-D transformation scheme is developed to simulate the response to a line source (i.e., spreading correction) for shallow seismic surface waves. In particular, Forbriger et al (2014), Schäfer et al (2014), and Groos et al (2017) proposed a stable workflow for 2-D FWI of shallow-seismic Rayleigh waves not only for synthetic data but also for real field-recorded data, in which a 3-D/2-D transformation scheme is developed to simulate the response to a line source (i.e., spreading correction) for shallow seismic surface waves.…”
Section: Zhang Et Al 368mentioning
confidence: 99%