Linkages between services and manufacturing as a new channel for GVC development: Evidence from CEE countries

Kordalska, Aleksandra; Olczyk, Magdalena

doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2021.05.003

Cited by 21 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In any case, CEE inclusion into GVCs had interesting spillover positive effects on labour productivity in related service providers or component suppliers (Orlic et al, 2018). Manufacturing successes also spill over to finance sectors (relatively more in the Czech Republic or the Baltics) or transportation services (relatively more in Poland, Slovakia, and Hungary), as noted by Kordalska and Olczyk (2021). Meanwhile, some ancillary services allow the countries to improve their involvement in upstream activities, and vertical specialization within the value chains causes core-periphery differences to be magnified, where CEE countries often play the periphery role (Gerőcs & Pinkasz, 2019).…”

Section: Specifics Of V4 Countriesmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…The latter finding constitutes the contribution of our paper to the GVC literature focused on the automotive industry. Not only will future success be measured by the value created or captured by a country (Kordalska & Olczyk, 2021), but it will also matter whether the economic activity is sustainable like green industrial policies are (Szalavetz, 2021). The same will apply to resilient GVCs (Pietrobelli et al, 2021) that are ready to face supply chain disruptions stemming from territorial risks, such as the war in Ukraine.…”

Section: Implications For Policy Research and Businessesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dynamics of GVC Position of v4 Automotive Suppliers: Implications for Public Policy

(ORCID:¹

2023

CEBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the post-covid world, governments explore options to enhance their policies so that corporations can act as successful motors of recovery and sustainable growth. Countries select various objectives related to global value chains (GVC), such as participation, value capture, inclusiveness, and resilience, yet might be unaware of the position of corporations they are supposed to motivate. In this paper, we aim to (re-)investigate the position of Visegrad Four (V4) suppliers within the regional automotive value chains and to compare results with suppliers in other EU member states using the trade in value-added (TiVA) statistics. We set two research questions: How does the position of V4 in automotive GVCs differ from the positions of other EU member states and significant other automotive producing countries? What is the link between the domestic value-added in gross exports of final automotive products and the selected policy variables? A multiple linear regression model is run with TiVA in the automotive industry as the dependent variable and independent variables embodying proxies of GVC-oriented policy consequences. The analysis determined significant differences in value-added levels between V4 countries and other EU countries, and other large automotive-producing economies. The labour cost, productivity, investment in R&D, and innovation support are among the factors where V4 countries fall behind. Implications for Central European audience: The results of our research might be helpful for respective authorities and governments in V4 and other Central and Eastern European countries. They can be of use when setting the goals of and implementing policies targeted at promoting innovation, upgrading within existing GVCs, and the cooperation between universities and research centres on the one hand and the automotive industry on the other.

show abstract

Section: Specifics Of V4 Countriesmentioning

confidence: 92%

Section: Implications For Policy Research and Businessesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dynamics of GVC Position of v4 Automotive Suppliers: Implications for Public Policy

(ORCID:¹

2023

CEBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Likewise, Ambroziak (2011) emphasized that the participation of CEE countries in the global production process had grown during the period from 1995 to 2011. Unlike previous studies, Cieślik, Biegańska & Środa-Murawska (2021) andKordalska & Olczyk (2021) conducted an empirical analysis for the period 2000-2014 Cieślik, Biegańska & Środa-Murawska (2021). reported that the highest rate of vertical specialization during the studied period accounted for Czech Republic and Poland.…”

mentioning

confidence: 91%

“…Furthermore, a strong decrease in the vertical specialization had been observed in Estonia and Lithuania. In general, the participation of the CEE countries in the global production network is still low and has a slow rate of growth Kordalska & Olczyk (2021). reported that the CEE countries' participation in the global production network had grown especially in the transportation sectors and scientific and technical activities.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

İmalat Sanayinde Dikey Uzmanlaşma: Orta ve Doğu Avrupa Ülkelerine Yönelik Bulgular

Nas

Maya²

2022

Fiscaoeconomia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Küreselleşme eğilimlerinin hız kazanmasıyla 1980 sonrası dönemde dünya ekonomisinde meydana gelen önemli dönüşümlerden biri de üretimin uluslararası parçalanmasıdır. Üretimin uluslararası parçalanması, bir nihai malın üretiminde birden fazla ülkenin üretim sürecinde farklı aşamalarında (dikey uzmanlaşma) farklı aşamaların yer alması ve bu süreçten katma değer sağlaması anlamına gelmektedir. Post-sosyalist ülkeler olarak tanımlanan Orta ve Doğu Avrupa (ODA) ülkeleri de özellikle Sovyetler Birliği’nin dağılmasıyla küresel üretim sürecine katılım eğilimleri artmıştır. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın teme amacı 2004 yılında AB’ye üye olana ODA ülkelerinin uluslararası üretimin parçalanma sürecine ne ölçüde katılım sağladığını analiz etmektir. Çalışmanın amacı doğrultusunda Hummels, Ishii & Yi (2001) tarafından önerilen HIY yöntemi kullanılarak analiz yapılmıştır. HIY yöntemini uygulamak için ülkelerin 2000-2014 dönemine ait ulusal girdi-çıktı tablolarından (NIOT) yararlanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre ODA ülkelerinde dikey uzmanlaşma oranı 2008-2009 küresel finans kriz döneminde azalmakla birlikte çalışma dönemi boyunca artış gösterdiği görülmüştür. Dikey uzmanlaşma oranının en yüksek olduğu ülkeler sırasıyla Macaristan, Slovakya, Estonya, Slovenya, Litvanya, Polonya ve Letonya’dır. İmalat sanayisine yönelik yapılan analiz sonucunda elde edilen bulgulara göre dikey uzmanlaşmanın en yüksek olduğu ülkeler sırasıyla Macaristan, Estonya, Slovakya, Letonya, Çek Cumhuriyeti, Slovenya, Polonya ve Litvanya’dır. Ayrıca Estonya, Macaristan, Letonya ve Polonya’da imalat sanayisindeki dikey uzmanlaşma oranı toplam ekonomideki dikey uzmanlaşma oranından daha yüksektir. Son olarak dikey uzmanlaşma Çek Cumhuriyeti, Letonya, Litvanya ve Polonya’da orta-düşük teknolojili sektörlerde daha yüksek iken, Estonya, Macaristan, Slovakya ve Slovenya’da ise orta-yüksek ve yüksek teknolojili sektörlerde daha yüksektir.

show abstract

“…2) Research methods. Most of the current studies build a GVC embedding index based on the "KPWW" method proposed by Koopman et al (2010) and discuss the environmental effects of GVC embedding (Kordalska and Olczyk, 2021;Bai and Yu, 2022). A few refer to the practice of Antras et al (2012) to construct the GVC embedding position index (Dai et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental effects of global value chain embedding in manufacturing industry in countries along the Belt and Road

Huang

Zhang²,

Jiang³

2022

Front. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While embedding in the global value chain (GVC), avoiding becoming a “pollution shelter” is an urgent issue that needs to be solved for the low-carbon economic development of countries along the Belt and Road. This study empirically analyzes the impact of manufacturing GVC embedding on carbon emissions and its mechanism from the perspectives of the embedding position and degree of the GVC. It then carries out group regressions by different industries, value chain embedding modes, and so on. Finally, this study constructs static and dynamic panel models to verify the nonlinear relationship between manufacturing GVC embedding and carbon emissions. The results show that the improvement of the embedding position of GVC in the manufacturing industry promotes an increase in carbon emissions; the deeper the embedding degree of GVC, the more conducive it is to carbon emissions reduction. Compared with the service industry, the impact of manufacturing GVC embedding on carbon emissions is more significant; regardless of the value chain embedding model, the deeper the embedding degree, the more conducive it is to carbon emissions reduction. Technological progress can weaken the impact of GVC embedding on carbon emissions. There is a U-shaped relationship between the GVC embedding position and carbon emissions in the manufacturing industry and an inverted U-shaped relationship between the GVC embedding degree and carbon emissions. This study provides beneficial insights for countries along the Belt and Road to embed into the GVC to avoid falling into the dilemma of “pollution growth”.

show abstract

Linkages between services and manufacturing as a new channel for GVC development: Evidence from CEE countries

Cited by 21 publications

References 32 publications

Dynamics of GVC Position of v4 Automotive Suppliers: Implications for Public Policy

Dynamics of GVC Position of v4 Automotive Suppliers: Implications for Public Policy

İmalat Sanayinde Dikey Uzmanlaşma: Orta ve Doğu Avrupa Ülkelerine Yönelik Bulgular

Environmental effects of global value chain embedding in manufacturing industry in countries along the Belt and Road

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About