Local Union Organization and Law Making in the US Congress

Abstract

The political power of labor unions is a contentious issue in the social sciences. Departing from the dominant focus on membership size, we argue that unions' influence on national lawmaking is based to an important degree on their local organization. We delineate the novel hypothesis that the horizontal concentration of union members within electoral districts matters. To test it, we draw on administrative records and map the membership size and concentration of local unions to districts of the U.S. House of Representatives, 2003Representatives, -2012. We find that, controlling for membership size, representatives from districts with less concentrated unions have more liberal voting records than their peers. This concentration effect survives numerous district controls and relaxing OLS assumptions. While surprising for several theoretical perspectives, it is consistent with theories based on social incentives. These results have implications for our broader understanding of political representation and the role of groups in democratic politics. * We are grateful to Duke University and the University of Konstanz (YSF) for financial support. MB also acknowledges financial support from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)-Labex IAST. We thank our editor and five reviewers, as well as Nicole

Legislative Staff and Representation in Congress

“…The final measure involves the density of labor unions in a staffer’s district or state, which we interpret as a measure of union strength. We rely on estimates of labor union membership by House district reported in Becher, Stegmueller, and Käppner (2018) and state union density from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (see Appendix J for more information). Unions represent an especially important mass-based group and check on corporate influence.…”

Financial Solidarity: The Future of Unions in the post-JanusEra

“…Strong labor unions may operate as an essential mediating institution that helps reduce political (Flavin 2016; Gilens 2012; Hacker and Pierson 2011) and economic inequality (Farber et al 2018). Many look to unions as the groups best positioned to attenuate upper-class biases in American politics (Schlozman, Verba, and Brady 2012), with high union membership levels encouraging more redistributive policy (Becher, Stegmuller, and Käppner 2018). In sum, the weakened state of public-sector labor law will likely have major political, electoral, and societal consequences that warrant study.…”

Labor Unions and Support for Redistribution in an Era of Inequality*

“…Indeed, unionized workers have higher wages and more generous benefits than do their nonunionized counterparts (Rosenfeld, ; Western and Rosenfeld, ), and working poverty is lower in U.S. counties with high levels of unionization (Brady, Baker, and Finnigan, ). Labor unions have been linked to more liberal public policy and lower inequality (Becher, Stegmueller, and Käppner, ; Bucci, ; Franko, Kelly, and Witko, ; Kelly and Witko, 2012; Radcliff and Saiz, ), as well as greater demand for redistribution and liberal public policy (Franko, ), at the U.S.‐state level, and greater political equality in representation (Ellis, ; Flavin, ). In a recent review, Ahlquist () notes that higher levels of unionization have been linked to lower levels of income inequality, both in the United States and cross‐nationally.…”