2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term functionality of woody debris structures for forest-floor small mammals on clearcuts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we showed that burrow microhabitat contained a high quantity of coarse woody debris, a feature particularly associated with small mammals’ presence, abundance and diversity ( e.g ., McComb, 2009 ; Fauteux et al, 2013 ; Sullivan & Sullivan, 2019 ), as they play diverse functional roles in predation avoidance. For instance, woody debris facilitates predator detection by prey by allowing the latter to rise above dense vegetative ground cover ( Machutchon & Harestad, 1990 ; Mahan & Yahner, 1996 ), and reduces detection of prey by predators, because movement over woody debris is faster and minimizes the noise produced compared to movement in dry leaf litter ( Roche, Schulte-Hostedde & Brooks, 1999 ; McCay, 2000 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we showed that burrow microhabitat contained a high quantity of coarse woody debris, a feature particularly associated with small mammals’ presence, abundance and diversity ( e.g ., McComb, 2009 ; Fauteux et al, 2013 ; Sullivan & Sullivan, 2019 ), as they play diverse functional roles in predation avoidance. For instance, woody debris facilitates predator detection by prey by allowing the latter to rise above dense vegetative ground cover ( Machutchon & Harestad, 1990 ; Mahan & Yahner, 1996 ), and reduces detection of prey by predators, because movement over woody debris is faster and minimizes the noise produced compared to movement in dry leaf litter ( Roche, Schulte-Hostedde & Brooks, 1999 ; McCay, 2000 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearings were produced by cutting young trees and leaving branches, tops and other small woody material on the ground as deadwood. This practice is regulated by the Piedmont Region to maintain fertility and protect soil from erosion, but also supports forest biodiversity, e.g., saproxylic species [53,54], small mammals [55,56] and reptiles [57]. In addition to creating the clearings, the plan included forest improvements, such as thinning and selective cutting in about 40 ha in the surrounding area of the corridor.…”
Section: Phase 3: Ad Hoc Solution To Reverse Habitat Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, various chipmunk and shrew species may use CWD as travel paths with little or no population response [72][73][74]. Clearly, red-backed voles and associated small mammals will persist in these structures for at least 12 years, at or near the abundance levels found in uncut forest [70]. The longevity of the structures may depend on the materials in the piles (e.g., tree species and climate) in terms of decay and functionality.…”
Section: Woody Debris Structures As Mammal Habitatmentioning
confidence: 99%