Mapping Above-Ground Biomass by Integrating Optical and SAR Imagery: A Case Study of Xixi National Wetland Park, China

Abstract

Abstract:Wetlands are important ecosystems as they are known as the "kidney of the earth". Particularly, urban wetlands play an important role in providing both natural and social beneficial services. However, urban wetlands are suffering from various human impacts, such as excessive land use conversion, air and water pollution, especially those in developing countries undergoing rapid industrialization and urbanization. Therefore, it is of great necessity to derive timely biomass information for optimal design, management and protection of urban wetlands. In this paper, we develop a set of models for estimating above ground biomass (AGB) in Xixi National Wetland Park in Hangzhou, China by using optical images and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images. A series of vegetation indices (VIs) derived from optical data is introduced along with spectral data. The modeling methods consist of (1) curve estimation; (2) linear regression for multivariable model; (3) Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) modeling. Curve estimation is a combination of linear and nonlinear regressions. It is applied to generate AGB models from a single variable including Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and radar backscatter coefficient. The models are then compared via three accuracy metrics. According to the results, SAR models generally show better accuracy than optical models and BPNN models show the greatest accuracy among all the models. The BPNN model from the combination of Terra Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) and European Remote-Sensing Satellite-2 (ERS-2) SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) image has the least root mean square (RMSE, 0.396 kg/m 2 ), least mean absolute error (MAE, 0.256 kg/m 2 ) and the greatest correlation coefficient (0.974). The results indicate that AGB can be estimated by integrating optical and SAR imagery. Four maps of AGB are derived to illustrate the distribution of AGB in the study area. The total AGB in the study area is estimated to be between 165,000 and 210,000 kg/m 2 .

Estimating Aboveground Biomass on Private Forest Using Sentinel-2 Imagery

“…The vegetation index is enhanced by strong reflectance of near infrared (NIR) due to leaf internal scattering and high chlorophyll absorption by the red region of wavelength. One of the vegetation indices used to estimate biomass is the normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI) [23][24][25][26]. However, there are certain problems associated with the use of NDVI.…”

Modelling Forest Aboveground Biomass Based on GF-3 Dual-Polarized and WorldView-3 Data: A Case Study in Datong National Wetland Park, China

“…Line transect and distance sampling research methods are commonly used, which build statistical models based on field observations of tree height and diameter at breast height (DBH) [8]. An alternative to gathering the large number of samples required for interpolation at the regional scale, remote-sensing data have been increasingly used to estimate wetland AGB in recent decades [9,10]. Biomass estimation and long-term biomass monitoring can be achieved using optical remote sensing, which obtains signals reflected from the forest canopy to extract vegetation parameters that have a significant response to biomass [11,12].…”

Spatial exploration, dendrometric characteristics and prediction models of wood production in a stand ofAcacia schaffneriin Durango, Mexico

“…Regarding that, remote sensing is a valuable method for estimating volumetric stocks and associated changes in forest populations over established periods of time (Rosenqvist et al, 2003;Timothy et al, 2016;Issa et al, 2020). Previous studies have analyzed the response of spectral indices (RSI) obtained from Sentinel-2 in the estimation of aerial biomass (Wani et al, 2015;Huang et al, 2016). However, it is advisable to complement the information obtained using RSI with direct field sampling and biomass estimation methods based on dendrometric variables (Torre-Tojal et al, 2019;Duncanson et al, 2020).…”