2017
DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2017.2.240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematics Test, Numerical Task and Mathematics Course as Determinants of Anxiety toward Math on College Students

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the variables that explain the anxiety towards mathematics in college students. For this purpose, we used the scale RMARS that integrate 25 items. The sample is non-probabilistic by convenience and the questionnaire was applied to 100 student's enrollment in the Instituto Tecnológico de Veracruz (ITVER). Exploratory factorial analysis with component extraction was used for data measurement. The internal consistency of the test was α=0.911. The Bartlett's test of Sphericit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Criterion: determinant must have a value greater than 0.00001. (Garcıá-Santillán et al, 2017). In other words, there is no multicollinearity problem between the variables presented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Criterion: determinant must have a value greater than 0.00001. (Garcıá-Santillán et al, 2017). In other words, there is no multicollinearity problem between the variables presented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…• Bartlett's test of sphericity: signi#icance equal to 0.000 and statistic of Pearson's Chi Square test equal to 1,053.120, for a critical value 95%, 91 = 114.268. Criterion: results below 0.05 are considered signi#icant, with statistic of Pearson's Chi Square test higher than the critical value for a signi#icance of 0.05 (Garcıá-Santillán et al, 2017). The values found for signi#icance and statistic of Pearson's Chi-square test attest to the existence of suf#icient relationships between variables for the application of the EFA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values correspond to the measure of sampling adequacy. In this regard García-Santillán et al (2017) explain that the MSA values must be greater than .5, so according to the results of tables 5 you can be in a position to reject the null hypothesis which refers to the non-existence of the set of latent variables since it cannot be explained by at least one factor.…”
Section: Source: Ownmentioning
confidence: 97%