“…In [11,12], the authors took the following approach to the S-duality transformation (1). For SU(2), SU(3), and SU(5), the conjectural closed formulae for the right hand side of ( 6) in [4,11,12,48] are explicit formulae involving modular forms and χ(O S ), K 2 S , a i a j , K S ξ, a i ξ, ξ 2 , where a i runs over the Seiberg-Witten basic classes of S. These formulae satisfy Conjecture 1.1 and make sense for non-algebraic classes ξ , thereby providing an ad hoc definition of Z…”