2004
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix hydrodynamic properties of carbonate rocks from the Betic Cordillera (Spain)

Abstract: Abstract:Laboratory tests performed on 181 rock samples from boreholes drilled in different areas of the Betic Cordillera allow us to calculate their hydraulic conductivity and open porosity values. Higher values are generally associated with Miocene calcareous sandstones, although hydraulic conductivity reaches its highest values in some isolated limestone and dolostone samples. Lower values were found in marly limestones and marbles. Specific yield ranged from 0 to 0Ð0798, with a mean value of 0Ð00579. A tot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1) (Zwieniecki & Newton, 1995), but rock-to-root water transfer is likely to be limited by rock hydraulic conductivity. Different types of carbonate rocks have hydraulic conductivities in the range 10 −9 -10 −12 m s −1 (Boving & Grathwohl, 2001;Pulido-Bosch et al, 2004), that is, several magnitudes lower than values reported for clayey soils (10 −5 -10 −9 m s −1 ), such as those dominating karstic areas (Kubota et al, 2005;Bhardwaj et al, 2007). Mycorrhizas might improve water transfer to the roots (Nardini et al, 2000;Bornyasz et al, 2005;Lehto & Zwiazek, 2011), but rock hydraulics would probably remain limiting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S1) (Zwieniecki & Newton, 1995), but rock-to-root water transfer is likely to be limited by rock hydraulic conductivity. Different types of carbonate rocks have hydraulic conductivities in the range 10 −9 -10 −12 m s −1 (Boving & Grathwohl, 2001;Pulido-Bosch et al, 2004), that is, several magnitudes lower than values reported for clayey soils (10 −5 -10 −9 m s −1 ), such as those dominating karstic areas (Kubota et al, 2005;Bhardwaj et al, 2007). Mycorrhizas might improve water transfer to the roots (Nardini et al, 2000;Bornyasz et al, 2005;Lehto & Zwiazek, 2011), but rock hydraulics would probably remain limiting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Based on the conventional permanent wilting point of −1.5 MPa, AWC rock values were 5 and 12 mg g −1 for dolostone and breccia, respectively. Contrasting AWC rock values were consistent with differences in V pores and d rock , and in agreement with previous reports on primary porosity of limestones and dolostones (Pulido‐Bosch et al ., 2004). These findings suggest that plants growing on different rock substrates have potential access to different amounts of available water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples used in these studies were typically collected from shallow, highly weathered bedrock layers and did not provide sufficient information to analyze water flow through a matrix of deep, weakly weathered bedrock layers. Few studies have reported the vertical distribution of K s including deep bedrock layers, measured using core samples from boreholes (Motyka et al, 1998; Flint, 2003; Pulido‐Bosch et al, 2004). Because K s is a fundamental hydraulic parameter, it is essential to obtain better knowledge of matrix K s and its relation to weathering degree.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, rock type (Pulido-Bosch et al 2004, Motyka et al 1998) and type of porosity (Zuber and Motyka, 1994). For instance, hydraulic conductivity of one aquifer has been determined to increase by as much as six orders of magnitude with increases in the volume of rock tested (Ewers 2006, White 2006.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%