2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring effective area inertia to determine fast-acting frequency response requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, one of the core project activities, directly related to frequency control, was monitoring of power system attributes directly affected by the increased penetration of nonsynchronous generation. In this context, novel approaches for monitoring of power system inertia were proposed [169][170][171]. One of particular research questions of the project was definition of regional inertia and approaches for its monitoring [170].…”
Section: Discussion On Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, one of the core project activities, directly related to frequency control, was monitoring of power system attributes directly affected by the increased penetration of nonsynchronous generation. In this context, novel approaches for monitoring of power system inertia were proposed [169][170][171]. One of particular research questions of the project was definition of regional inertia and approaches for its monitoring [170].…”
Section: Discussion On Future Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing both Kp and Ki widens the control bandwidth whilst gains at low frequencies and rejection of steady-state errors are mainly increased by increasing the value of Ki. Using (16) to (19) for analysis and controller design, different step-responses can be obtained as shown in Fig. 4 with fixed Kp = 0.001 and different values of Ki .…”
Section: Conventional Direct Power Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, microgrids with increasing levels of power electronicbased sources, decrease the available inertia of the power system due to the decreasing ratio of the total system kinetic energy with respect to the total power of the system [15]. Systems with reduced inertia may be susceptible to large frequency deviations beyond the permitted limits and a high rate of change of frequency (ROCOF), leading to system failure and power blackout due to the activation of protection devices [16]- [17]. Accordingly, such microgrids may be categorized as grids with low inertia, especially when they are islanded or isolated, operating with DEGs that have relatively low inertia constants compared with those of typical synchronous generators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online identification can be further divided into two kinds of methods. The first kind is to calculate the inertia contributed by all online traditional generators (TGs) [17], [18], which only yields a lower bound of the system inertia. The second method is to use the power disturbance data recorded by the PMU to identify system inertia during the online stage [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%