2008
DOI: 10.1139/f08-106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms underlying the increase in young-of-the-year Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) density with habitat complexity

Abstract: We tested three hypotheses used to explain the increase in young-of-the-year (YOY) Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) density with habitat complexity: the territory-size, predator-refuge, and foraging-benefits hypotheses. We manipulated habitat complexity in three different treatments (boulder-removed, control, and boulder-added) at eight sites in Catamaran Brook and the Little Southwest Miramichi River, New Brunswick. The density of juvenile salmon was two times higher in the boulder-added treatment than in the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible explanation for this could be that refuging increases prey density, thereby increasing levels of resource competition, which itself has been demonstrated to increase the strength of NCEs [45,46]. However, other studies suggest that increasing habitat complexity and reducing the visual field of salmon fry result in increased local densities [47,48] due to reduced territorial behaviour [49,50]. Recently, it was shown that smaller territory sizes do not result in differences in growth rate due to limited foraging opportunities in salmon fry [51,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation for this could be that refuging increases prey density, thereby increasing levels of resource competition, which itself has been demonstrated to increase the strength of NCEs [45,46]. However, other studies suggest that increasing habitat complexity and reducing the visual field of salmon fry result in increased local densities [47,48] due to reduced territorial behaviour [49,50]. Recently, it was shown that smaller territory sizes do not result in differences in growth rate due to limited foraging opportunities in salmon fry [51,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heggenes et al (1999) found that small trout (<7 cm) were abundant in shallow areas with water velocities ranging from 10 to 50 cm 3 Ás À1 , while larger trout (>7 cm) were found in deeper and more slowflowing habitats. Shelter or cover is related to the substrate composition (Finstad et al 2007;Venter et al 2008), and survival has been connected to access to shelter and cover for salmonids (Chapman 1966;Hunt 1976;Marschall & Crowder 1995;Finstad et al 2007). In our study, trout has a higher variation in habitat choice dependent on species, density and fish size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydraulic conditions specially affect territory area and foraging behaviour, since it is directly linked to the availability, distribution and composition of drifting prey (Reid and Thoms, 2008). Territory area typically decreases as habitat quality and complexity (Imre et al, 2002;Dolinsek et al, 2007;Venter et al, 2008), or food abundance (Keeley, 2000) increase. Moreover, biotic factors such as competition with introduced species can modify aggression and foraging behaviour in fish populations (Seiler and Keeley, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%