Methodological institutionalism 2.0: From institutions to institutional configurations

Frolov, Daniil

doi:10.32609/0042-8736-2016-7-147-160

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Digital technology alone can neither increase the efficiency of economic entities, nor damage them. Everything depends on the institutional "interface" of these technologies, on the inseparable "shell" of rules, norms of behavior, common beliefs and ideas, collective expectations and scenarios, social statuses, models of organization and other forms of social streamlining of economic activity (Frolov, 2016). Any information or digital technology itself can produce directly opposite effects.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regulatory Policy for Digital Economy: Holistic Institutional Framework

Frolov¹,

Lavrentyeva²

2019

Montenegrin Journal of Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article analyzes the nature and specificity of digital economy as an object of regulation from the standpoint of institutional methodology. It reveals the logic of digital economy evolution and its internal contradictions. The authors hold comparative analysis of approaches to defining the essence and forms, functions and structure of digital economy. The categorical apparatus of the theory of digital economy is specified and supplemented. We proposed a conceptual model of a multi-level transition of the economy to a digital development scenario. The conceptual recommendations on the development of the digital economy regulation system are presented. We propose to distinguish between digital and digitized sectors, which cover the industries directly and indirectly related to digital technologies and products. As an indication we proposed to highlight the institutional and companyspecific digital sector. The conclusion was made about the importance of creating an institutional environment using hybrid institutions based on a combination of algorithmic and traditional law in a multilevel format and in the mode of experiments like regulatory sandboxes, legal foresight, public discussion. JEL classification:B52.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regulatory Policy for Digital Economy: Holistic Institutional Framework

Frolov¹,

Lavrentyeva²

2019

Montenegrin Journal of Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…When constructing a holistic vision of the development of national economies, it is important to overcome the difficulties associated with delineating the concepts of culture and institutions [16]. As noted by A. Alesin and P. Giuliano, confusion is created by labeling the "institute" for everything.…”

Section: Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

The Culture and Institutions: Features of Interaction and Impact on the Economy

Romanenko¹,

Biryukov²

2020

Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Far East Con" (ISCFEC 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article proposes a methodology for studying the relationship of culture and institutions in economic processes, based on rethinking the relationship of economic culture and institutionalized forms of economic development in the framework of the intersubjective paradigm. It allows to go beyond traditional value-neutral and normative theories in understanding the development mechanisms of national economics. It focuses the research on a real variety of motives for the behavior of subjects and value-cognitive strategies for using resources to influence changes in the configuration of power and institutional structure, formal and informal institutions, as well as interaction models. The purpose of the study is to develop an approach that provides a systematic description of the endogenous relations of culture, institutions and economics within the framework of the intersubjective paradigm. The objective of the research is to propose a two-level approach to the analysis of endogenous relations of cultural and value variables, institutional and behavioral variables; to develop a holistic vision of the formation of the value-institutional system of the economy as a result of a compromise of interacting different actors; to justify the relevance and increasing importance of the implementation of ethicaloriented approach in the formation of institutional practices and in solving strategic problems. To substantiate the conclusions and positions, the methods of the constructivist approach, historical-logical and comparative analysis, methods of analysis of complex systems and scientific observation are used. The statements and conclusions formulated in the article contribute to the expansion of the problem field and to the deepening of theoretical ideas about the role of cultural and value variables and institutional variables in the formation of models of the development of national economies. The practical significance of the research results presented in the article is that it can be used in the development of programs and projects for the implementation of innovation changes in the economy.

show abstract

“…Данная концепция еще не получила широкого развития в теории и методологии институционального анализа, но, по нашему мнению, имеет серьезные научные перспективы, о чем свидетельствует рост в последние годы числа публикаций, посвящённых конфигурационному анализу в зарубежной печати [19; 20; 21 и т.д.]. Среди отечественных исследований нужно отметить работу Д. Фролова, в которой автор достаточно последовательно обосновывает новую версию методологического институционализма, в основе которой лежит «концепция институциональных конфигураций, направленная на преодоление искусственного разрыва субъектнообъектной структуры институтов и их систем, когда институты десубъективированы, а агенты деинституционализированы» [15]. По мнению Д. Фролова, применение концепции институциональных конфигураций, то есть моделей взаимодействия институтов и их стейкхолдеров в конкретном экономическом пространстве, позволяет рассматривать «институционализацию в единстве ее субъектов (отношенческих и категориальных социальных групп) и факторов (институтов)» [15], что с нашей точки зрения, позволяет повысить эффективность институционального анализа при проведении прикладных исследований.…”

Section: инновационные подходы к исследованию процессов генерирования зон институциональных аттракторов в региональной деловой средеunclassified