2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microalgal cultivation using aquaculture wastewater: Integrated biomass generation and nutrient remediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
93
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Liu et al [31] assessed the potential of five species of microalgae (C. vulgaris, Chlorococcum sp. GD, Parachlorella kessleri TY, Scenedesmus quadricauda, and Scenedesmus obliquus) in the treatment of aquaculture wastewater and found that, after 5 days, nitrates, nitrites, total ammonium, and phosphorus were removed the study conducted by Ansari et al [32], the reduction of ammonium ions achieved with S. obliquus, Chlorella sorokiniana, and Ankistrodesmus falcatus was in the range of 86.45-98.21%, nitrates in the range of 75.76-80.85%, and phosphates in the range of 98.52-100%. the study conducted by Ansari et al [32], the reduction of ammonium ions achieved with S. obliquus, Chlorella sorokiniana, and Ankistrodesmus falcatus was in the range of 86.45-98.21%, nitrates in the range of 75.76-80.85%, and phosphates in the range of 98.52-100%.…”
Section: Removal Of Nitrogen and Phosphorus From Aquaculture Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Liu et al [31] assessed the potential of five species of microalgae (C. vulgaris, Chlorococcum sp. GD, Parachlorella kessleri TY, Scenedesmus quadricauda, and Scenedesmus obliquus) in the treatment of aquaculture wastewater and found that, after 5 days, nitrates, nitrites, total ammonium, and phosphorus were removed the study conducted by Ansari et al [32], the reduction of ammonium ions achieved with S. obliquus, Chlorella sorokiniana, and Ankistrodesmus falcatus was in the range of 86.45-98.21%, nitrates in the range of 75.76-80.85%, and phosphates in the range of 98.52-100%. the study conducted by Ansari et al [32], the reduction of ammonium ions achieved with S. obliquus, Chlorella sorokiniana, and Ankistrodesmus falcatus was in the range of 86.45-98.21%, nitrates in the range of 75.76-80.85%, and phosphates in the range of 98.52-100%.…”
Section: Removal Of Nitrogen and Phosphorus From Aquaculture Wastewatermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…-97.1%, 94.3-99.8%, 97.9-98.9%, and 90.2-98.9%, respectively. In the study conducted by Ansari et al[32], the reduction of ammonium ions achieved with S. obliquus, Chlorella sorokiniana, and Ankistrodesmus falcatus was in the range of 86.45-98.21%, nitrates in the range of 75.76-80.85%, and phosphates in the range of 98.52-100%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, in this work solids were measured for the sake of simplicity and because in these microalgae systems there is a very good correlation between chlorophyll a and solids (García et al, 1998(García et al, , 2006. Also because microalgae production in culture systems is usually given in biomass weight (Ansari et al, 2017).…”
Section: Biomass Production and Final Effluent Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to date, most of the studies devoted to phytoremediation of agriculturalrelated wastes by means of microalgae have focused on lab-scale experiments to treat industrial effluents, such as those from dairy farms (Labbé et al, 2017), palm oil mills (Kamyab et al, 2015) or rice mills (Kumar et al, 2016). The treatment of aquaculture effluents and diluted pig slurry treatments were also investigated in different works (Ansari et al, 2017;Lananan et al, 2014;Ledda et al, 2016). The capacity of microalgae to remove pesticides from agriculture run-off was also evaluated by Matamoros et al (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cultivation of microalgae in a nutrient-rich effluent as an inexpensive, readily available and cheap medium is expected to overcome the economic dilemma of biodiesel production as well as decrease the environmental problems arising from discharging nutrients into bodies of water. Utilization of wastewater for the cultivation of microalgae has several advantages, including providing an alternative source for the huge amounts water required for growing algae, which presents a supplemental source of nutrients, as well as decreases the load of contaminants, according to Ansari et al (2017). On the other hand, numerous challenges are faced by the cultivation of microalgae in wastewater, such as the unbalanced N/P ratio, the extraordinary biological pollutants and competitors, low biomass and lipid content production, and the low level of effective nutrient elimination (Xin et al, 2010;Min et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%