2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological profiles in clinical and subclinical cases of mastitis in milking Jafarabadi buffalo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…L., which is considered a commensal species, has also been detected in raw milk sampled from healthy bovine mammary glands (Lafarge et al 2004). In our trial, the mean proportions of L. in group M was higher than that of other groups, which is consistent with Patel et al (2019) who reported that milk samples from subclinical mastitis cow had higher abundance of L. compared to healthy cows. Some strains of L. exhibit high adherence to bovine mammary epithelial cells, which means L. can also enter mammary gland of mastitis cows through teat and contaminant with pathogenic bacterial (Hagi et al 2013).…”
Section: Itemssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…L., which is considered a commensal species, has also been detected in raw milk sampled from healthy bovine mammary glands (Lafarge et al 2004). In our trial, the mean proportions of L. in group M was higher than that of other groups, which is consistent with Patel et al (2019) who reported that milk samples from subclinical mastitis cow had higher abundance of L. compared to healthy cows. Some strains of L. exhibit high adherence to bovine mammary epithelial cells, which means L. can also enter mammary gland of mastitis cows through teat and contaminant with pathogenic bacterial (Hagi et al 2013).…”
Section: Itemssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A significant impediment to milk production by water buffalo herds is mastitis, which affects the quantity, quality, and safety of milk, causes heavy economic loss, leads to increased use of antibiotics, and impairs animal welfare (Salvador et al ., 2012). Clinical mastitis (CM) can be diagnosed by visible changes in the milk, udder, and systemic condition of animals, but subclinical mastitis (SCM) remains undetectable in most cases due to lack of clinical signs (Patel et al ., 2019). In water buffalo, SCM is around three-fold more common than CM (Ali et al ., 2014) and is responsible for declining milk production, deteriorating milk quality and reduced milk processability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important aetiological agents of SCM are reported to be non-aureus staphylococci (NAS), Staphylococcus aureus , Streptococcus spp. and Escherichia coli (Dhakal, 2006; Patel et al ., 2019). Among the staphylococci, NAS have been found to be dominant pathogens in IMI (Moroni et al ., 2006; Ali et al ., 2011; Guha and Guha, 2012; Locatelli et al ., 2013) as well as in SCM and mild forms of clinical mastitis (Frey et al ., 2013; Gindonis et al ., 2013; Xu et al ., 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the dairy industry, one of the important diseases in cattle is mastitis (Patel, Kunjadia, Koringa, Joshi, & Kunjadiya, 2019). Mastitis is characterized by inflammation of the mammary gland caused by infection with bacterial pathogen group (Kudi, Bray, Niba, & Kalla, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mastitis is characterized by inflammation of the mammary gland caused by infection with bacterial pathogen group (Kudi, Bray, Niba, & Kalla, 2009). Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Escherichia, and Streptococcus are the most common bacterial genera that cause mastitis (Patel, Kunjadia, Koringa, Joshi, & Kunjadiya, 2019). Kudi, Bray, Niba, & Kalla (2009) reported that mastitis can be differentiated into clinical and subclinical mastitis, and dairy cattle often acquire the subclinical condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%