1979
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210530214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microdefects in silicon different from swirls

Abstract: Two modifications of double crystal X‐ray topography are applied to detect microdefects in FZ silicon. With about 30 different crystals no contrasts from swirl defects are obtained. However, all the crystals contain defects not reported hitherto. Their dimensions are probably between (or below) 10 and 30 μm and their average density is 103 to 104 cm−3. According to preliminary TEM observations these are presumedly formed by precipitation colonies of an unknown phase. The size of the individual particles is ≦ 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
5

Year Published

1981
1981
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A small difference in the volumes of interstitial atoms Si and 0 is not essential for our considerations. Electron microscopy observations will not reveal elastic distortions just near the precipitates similar to [2], whereas in X-ray topographic observations the precipitate colony will be revealed as a single defect of vacancy type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…A small difference in the volumes of interstitial atoms Si and 0 is not essential for our considerations. Electron microscopy observations will not reveal elastic distortions just near the precipitates similar to [2], whereas in X-ray topographic observations the precipitate colony will be revealed as a single defect of vacancy type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…(32)), and the amplitude E a H can be found from the corresponding boundary condition D S (r) = E S (r)| z=0 by using the relations (33). When the approximation of the semiinfinite crystal is valid, i.e., the inequality m 0 t ) 1 holds, where m 0 is the linear coefficient of photoelectric absorption, only one wave field is remaining in the crystal, i.e., d ¼ 1 or 2 in dependence on the sign of Dq.…”
Section: Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the introduction of the cut-off parameter k c imposes an implicit restriction on the allowable value of the effective defect radius R eff which gives the upper bound of transfer momenta k m ¼ 2p/R eff in the Huang scattering region (k c k k m ), since the used kinematical model becomes inapplicable at R eff > L. In practice, however, as is known from the topographic observations [33][34][35], the sizes of microdefects in asgrown as well as annealed silicon single crystals can exceed appreciably the actual values of the extinction length in the case of Bragg diffraction and reach from several units to tens and even hundreds of micrometers. At sufficiently large concentrations they can contribute significantly to the diffuse scattering intensity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conditions for observation of such defects in electron microscopy (0 < 1, P = 0) qualitatively differ from those in X-ray topography (0 = 1, P > l), therefore the electron microscopy methods used for the determination of defect characteristics cannot be directly applied to X-ray topography. In particular, the large Bragg angle in X-ray diffraction results in the appearance of a dynamical wave (7) which generates a comet-like tail of the image [4] in the direction ( -g ) . I n Fig.…”
Section: Plane-wave Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%