2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/806/2/161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microlensing Events From the 11 Year Observations of the Wendelstein Calar Alto Pixellensing Project

Abstract: We present the results of the decade-long M31 observation from the Wendelstein Calar Alto Pixellensing Project (WeCAPP). WeCAPP has monitored M31 from 1997 till 2008 in both R-and I-filters, thus provides the longest baseline of all M31 microlensing surveys. The data are analyzed with the difference imaging analysis, which is most suitable to study variability in crowded stellar fields. We extracted light curves based on each pixel, and devised selection criteria that are optimized to identify microlensing eve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A nice review of the state of the art and some new data is presented in ref. [47] with the conclusion that some statistical studies and individual microlensing events point to a non-negligible MACHO population, though the fraction in the halo mass remains uncertain.…”
Section: Pos(multif2019)013mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A nice review of the state of the art and some new data is presented in ref. [47] with the conclusion that some statistical studies and individual microlensing events point to a non-negligible MACHO population, though the fraction in the halo mass remains uncertain.…”
Section: Pos(multif2019)013mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…AGAPE collaboration [45], finds the halo MACHO fraction in the range 0.2 < f < 0.9. while MEGA group presented the upper limit f < 0.3 [46]. On the other hand, the recent discovery of 10 new microlensing events [47] is very much in favor of MACHO existence. The authors conclude: "statistical studies and individual microlensing events point to a non-negligible MACHO population, though the fraction in the halo mass remains uncertain".…”
Section: Pos(multif2019)013mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nice review of the state of the art and some new data are presented in ref. [36] with the conclusion that some statistical studies and individual microlensing events point to a nonnegligible MACHO population, though the fraction in the halo mass remains uncertain.…”
Section: Problems With Machosmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…AGAPE collaboration [24], finds the halo Macho fraction in the range 0.2 < f < 0.9. while MEGA group presented the upper limit f < 0.3 [25]. On the other hand, the recent discovery of 10 new microlensing events [36] is very much in favor of MACHO existence. The authors conclude: "statistical studies and individual microlensing events point to a non-negligible MACHO population, though the fraction in the halo mass remains uncertain".…”
Section: Problems With Machosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This applies for example for the difference imaging code presented by Gössl and Riffeser (2002) into which we embed rambrain in order to overcome exactly these limitations set by main memory. High resolution images taken with state of the art instruments (see for example Lee et al, 2012Lee et al, , 2015 can easily be of about 14000 2 pixels in size, each. Typically kernels with several hundreds of free parameters are used which lead to an exemplary memory consumption by kernel matrices of ImageSize · KernelSize · (V alues + Errors) · f loat = 14000 2 · 400 · 2 · 4B ≈ 600GB.…”
Section: Real World Application: Difference Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%