2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.99.123019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microlensing of x-ray pulsars: A method to detect primordial black hole dark matter

Abstract: Primordial black holes (PBHs) with a mass from 10 −16 to 10 −11 M may comprise 100% of dark matter. Due to a combination of wave and finite source size effects, the traditional microlensing of stars does not probe this mass range. In this paper, we point out that X-ray pulsars with higher photon energies and smaller source sizes are good candidate sources for microlensing for this mass window. Among the existing X-ray pulsars, the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) X-1 source is found to be the best candidate becaus… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These bounds will not be sensitive to the presence of the EWS corona [92,93], especially because the corona is inside the Einstein radius. Eventually, microlensing of X-ray pulsars [94] and femtolensing [95] or lensing parallax [96] of gamma ray bursts could set bounds down to…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These bounds will not be sensitive to the presence of the EWS corona [92,93], especially because the corona is inside the Einstein radius. Eventually, microlensing of X-ray pulsars [94] and femtolensing [95] or lensing parallax [96] of gamma ray bursts could set bounds down to…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is a large gap between our result and the next constraint, at M PBH ¼ 10 23 g, from Subaru microlensing data [19,24], where PBHs are currently allowed to make up all the DM. Many ideas have been proposed in order to constrain PBHs in this and higher-mass windows [87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97]. Additionally, we note that our constraints would be tighter for highly spinning PBHs.…”
Section: B Ultralight Pbhsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There exist numerous observational constraints on the fraction of DM comprised of PBHs ( [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], see recent reviews [21][22][23] and references therein), however, there still exists parameter space where PBHs can form all of the DM [11,24,25]. Multiple ideas have also been proposed in order to probe PBHs in various mass ranges [26][27][28][29]. Given this increased scrutiny of PBHs (which started after the direct detection of gravitational waves [30,31] and the subsequent proposal that these BHs are primordial in nature [32][33][34][35]), it is obvious to ask if we have explored all the properties of BHs in our searches for PBHs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%