2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.89.012110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Model of waterlike fluid under confinement for hydrophobic and hydrophilic particle-plate interaction potentials

Abstract: Molecular dynamic simulations were employed to study a water-like model confined between hydrophobic and hydrophilic plates. The phase behavior of this system is obtained for different distances between the plates and particle-plate potentials. For both hydrophobic and hydrophilic walls there are the formation of layers. Crystallization occurs at lower temperature at the contact layer than at the middle layer. In addition, the melting temperature decreases as the plates become more hydrophobic. Similarly, the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
52
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
5
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the idea that the hydration water shows a very distinct behavior when confined in globular proteins [51], in hydrophobic [52] and in hydrophilic [53] nanopores due to the dominant interaction with the confining system. While close to the hydrophilic sites the dynamics shows a change at 240 K due to the mobility of the protein-water entity, the water close to the hydrophobic sites becomes more mobile by unbinding from the protein.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result is consistent with the idea that the hydration water shows a very distinct behavior when confined in globular proteins [51], in hydrophobic [52] and in hydrophilic [53] nanopores due to the dominant interaction with the confining system. While close to the hydrophilic sites the dynamics shows a change at 240 K due to the mobility of the protein-water entity, the water close to the hydrophobic sites becomes more mobile by unbinding from the protein.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…When confined by fixed hydrophilic plates, the fluid-wall interaction can induce solidification and shift the anomalous properties to higher temperatures, while hydrophobic nanopores lead the system to remain in liquid state and shift the waterlike anomalies to lower temperatures in relation to bulk. 41,42 Whereas, when the nanopore has at least one degree of freedom, given by the mobility of the plates in z direction, the anomalous behavior of the fluid disappears and distinct phase transitions are observed. [43][44][45][46] CS fluids confined in nanotubes also present interesting findings, similar to obtained in atomistic models for water, as the increase in diffusion coefficient and flux for narrow nanotubes associated to a layer to single-file transition and a discontinuity in the enhancement flow factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to answer these questions water-like atomistic or continuous effective potential models were explored. The confining geometries could be plates [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], one pore [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], and a disordered matrix [43,52,53,[55][56][57]. The results for the melting temperature obtained within these approaches are controversial, while results for SPC/E water show that the melting temperature for hydrophobic plates is lower than the melting for the unconfined system and higher than for the system confined by hydrophilic walls, for the mW model no difference between the melting temperatures due to the hydrophobicity [47] is found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%