2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10044-012-0314-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling and predicting news popularity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example existing work in pattern analysis that uses natural language processing and statistics based machine learning to identify news popularity [45] could be adopted to evaluate app descriptions. Research has also been conducted to investigate the use of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to evaluate app description against app behavior [46].…”
Section: Addressing Packaging Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example existing work in pattern analysis that uses natural language processing and statistics based machine learning to identify news popularity [45] could be adopted to evaluate app descriptions. Research has also been conducted to investigate the use of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to evaluate app description against app behavior [46].…”
Section: Addressing Packaging Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can also see that New York Times and NPR readers share very similar interests, favouring content related to science, technology, health and education research. We can see a general trend, also reported in [9], that readers avoid news content about public affairs, as represented here by terms such as Obama, Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan appearing prominently in the negative features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…To solve this problem, our prior results indicate that one needs to solve a preference learning task that consists of classifying ordered pairs of articles [9]. We call this classifier a ranker.…”
Section: Learning To Rank Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations