2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(00)01371-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Molecular recognition of procainamide-imprinted polymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…628,865,910 However, MIPs can show effective recognition in solvents other than that used as porogen, including aqueous buffers; 911 in this case a switch in recognition mechanism from H-bonding to hydrophobic recognition can be demonstrated by a loss of recognition in intermediate aqueous-organic mixtures. 891,912 The effect of organic modifiers, such as acetic acid, on binding to MIPs in HPLC has been studied; 913 they function by reducing non-specific interactions with both MIP and control. The use of surfactants as modifiers in aqueous-based recognition studies and in SPE and chromatography has also been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…628,865,910 However, MIPs can show effective recognition in solvents other than that used as porogen, including aqueous buffers; 911 in this case a switch in recognition mechanism from H-bonding to hydrophobic recognition can be demonstrated by a loss of recognition in intermediate aqueous-organic mixtures. 891,912 The effect of organic modifiers, such as acetic acid, on binding to MIPs in HPLC has been studied; 913 they function by reducing non-specific interactions with both MIP and control. The use of surfactants as modifiers in aqueous-based recognition studies and in SPE and chromatography has also been reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth of a threedimensional polymeric structure around the template produces binding sites with proper shape and charge distribution has greatly effected molecular recognition. It has been demonstrated that a significant contribution in the interaction between template molecules and functional groups on the surface of the binding sites is due to the hydrogen bond [13 -15] and ionexchange phenomena, [16] and the environment around the binding site, [17] For example, most MIPs are prepared by non-covalent imprinting and the common systems are based on commodity methacrylic monomers, such as methacrylic acid because its carboxyl group is the most common hydrogen bonding and acidic functional group in molecular imprinting, cross-linked with ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate. [18,19] In this work, the monolithic MIP column was prepared by a simple, one step, in-situ, free-radical polymerization "molding" process directly within the chromatographic column, without the tedious procedures of grinding, sieving, and column packing.…”
Section: Special Selectivity Of Molecularly Imprinted Monolithic Statmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, most of the research on MIP have used very high portion of crosslinking monomer to maintain the three-dimensional shapes for the template. [10][11][12][13][14] As a consequence of the use of high concentration of crosslinking monomer, an extremely rigid polymer were obtained. The rigidity makes MIP very difficult to remove the template.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%