2011
DOI: 10.1080/03602559.2011.566239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphologies and Mechanical Properties of Polyurethane/Epoxy Resin Interpenetrating Network Composites Modified with Kaolin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant improvement in EP mechanical properties by the addition of two different modifiers was already confirmed and reported in the literature. 32,33 Tensile adhesive strength (TAS) and shear adhesive strength (SAS) of EP are presented in Table 2 as a function of nanoclay (Nanobent ZW1) and reactive rubber (ATBN) content. Addition of either modifier improved the adhesive strength of the polymer matrix.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant improvement in EP mechanical properties by the addition of two different modifiers was already confirmed and reported in the literature. 32,33 Tensile adhesive strength (TAS) and shear adhesive strength (SAS) of EP are presented in Table 2 as a function of nanoclay (Nanobent ZW1) and reactive rubber (ATBN) content. Addition of either modifier improved the adhesive strength of the polymer matrix.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, studies have focused on novel approaches to toughen epoxy thermosets. For instance, interpenetrating networks 21,22 and hyperbranched polymer 23,24 can not only toughen epoxy resin but also improve modulus without sacricing T g which has attracted the attention of researchers. However, prohibitive costs and complicated preparation limit the applications of these strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of impact performance was 76.6 kJ/m 2 , which is better than the 9.25 kJ/m 2 in Park’s study and the 17.63 kJ/m 2 in Hai-an Xie’s study [34,35]. Compared with that reported in other people’s research, the performance of the pressure resistance is greatly improved [36]. The results are in agreement with those shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%