2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2014
DOI: 10.1109/embc.2014.6944261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective optimization-based design of wearable electrocardiogram monitoring systems

Abstract: Nowadays, the use of Wearable User Interfaces has been extensively growing in medical monitoring applications. However, production and manufacture of prototypes without automation tools may lead to non viable results since it is often common to find an optimization problem where several variables are in conflict with each other. Thus, it is necessary to design a strategy for balancing the variables and constraints, systematizing the design in order to reduce the risks that are present when it is exclusively gu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the particular case of ECG monitoring, the constraints reflecting where sensors can gather useful information about the human body and the constraints of wearability should be strongly considered [37]. Moreover, the following variables have been reported as having a substantial influence on the ECG measurement: sensor location [12,30,33,38], the electrode-skin contact [30,38,39], and signal quality [13,28,30]. Despite this reported importance, a close relationship…”
Section: Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the particular case of ECG monitoring, the constraints reflecting where sensors can gather useful information about the human body and the constraints of wearability should be strongly considered [37]. Moreover, the following variables have been reported as having a substantial influence on the ECG measurement: sensor location [12,30,33,38], the electrode-skin contact [30,38,39], and signal quality [13,28,30]. Despite this reported importance, a close relationship…”
Section: Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing Interaction Size (volume) [7,13,28,[30][31][32][33][34][35] Latency [12,13] Skin irritation [8] Weight [7-9, 12, 13, 28, 30, 31, 33-35] Processing power and computational cost [16,30,32] Comfort, thermal aspects, heat dissipation [8-13, 30, 31, 33] Electrical resistance [8,30] Security and privacy [8,30,31] User Interface [11,[30][31][32] Stiffness and flexural endurance [8,30] Communication channels, networking [7,8,13,30,31,34] Weather [11,30] Fluid repellency [28,40] Storage capacity and memory [7,10] Need for survival and medical prescriptions [30,[41][42][43]] Magnetic shielding and radiation concerns [8,13,28,30] Dynamic volt...…”
Section: Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%