2008
DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/bxm123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplier Evolution: A Family of Multiplier VLSI Implementations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The delay and design effort of this stage are highly dependent on the maximum height of the bit array. It is recognized that reduction arrays of 4:2 carry-save adders may lead to more regular layouts [16]. For instance, with a maximum height of 16, a total of 3 levels of 4:2 carry-save adders would be necessary.…”
Section: Basic Radix-16 Booth Multipliermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The delay and design effort of this stage are highly dependent on the maximum height of the bit array. It is recognized that reduction arrays of 4:2 carry-save adders may lead to more regular layouts [16]. For instance, with a maximum height of 16, a total of 3 levels of 4:2 carry-save adders would be necessary.…”
Section: Basic Radix-16 Booth Multipliermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, for radix-16 and n-bit operands, about n/4 partial products are generated. Although less popular than radix-4, there exist industrial instances of radix-8 [10]- [16]. and radix-16 multipliers [17] in microprocessors implementations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the wordlength becomes longer, the radix has been extended to radix-8 [4]- [6] and even radix-16 [7]. The advantage is that the PP reduction tree is shallower (faster and less power demanding) at expenses of a more complicate PP generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%