2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2020.108338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutagenic potential of medicinal plants evaluated by the Ames Salmonella/microsome assay: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, the number of studies using this type of assay to evaluate plant extracts’ genotoxic/mutagenic potential has increased [ 40 ]. Studies have reported that several plants used in traditional medicine are potentially genotoxic [ 40 , 41 ] and some of the species identified as genotoxic belong to the Anacardiaceae family (e.g., Anacardium ocidentale , Taipirira guianensis ) [ 42 ], including one species from the genus Lannea [ 43 ]. According to these authors, Lannea edulis presented marginal genotoxicity in the strain TA97, but Lannea discolor did not [ 43 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the number of studies using this type of assay to evaluate plant extracts’ genotoxic/mutagenic potential has increased [ 40 ]. Studies have reported that several plants used in traditional medicine are potentially genotoxic [ 40 , 41 ] and some of the species identified as genotoxic belong to the Anacardiaceae family (e.g., Anacardium ocidentale , Taipirira guianensis ) [ 42 ], including one species from the genus Lannea [ 43 ]. According to these authors, Lannea edulis presented marginal genotoxicity in the strain TA97, but Lannea discolor did not [ 43 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results presented in Table 3, in which selected strains TA98, TA100, and TA102 show a 93% prediction of detecting gene mutations, 91,92 we can conclude that hit 15g does not have mutagenic potential, despite exhibited cytotoxic potential only at the higher concentration tested (5000 μg) against TA98 and TA100 (MI ≤ 0.7), and thus, this is a strong candidate for further exploration at in vivo tests. Moreover, these findings are contrary to previous in silico prediction of Ames test toxicity for 15g (Supporting Information, Table S2), it is crucial to conduct bench tests to validate the results obtained through computer simulations, highlighting their significance.…”
Section: ■ Chemistry Remarksmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The Ames test measures the mutagenic potential of chemicals [10,11]. Most of the mutagenity tests were performed on bacteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the mutagenity tests were performed on bacteria. The Ames microplate fluctuation (MPF) test has essentially the same principles as the traditional Ames test, but new standards have been established for this type of test [10,11,12]. It has many advantages over the traditional Ames test and complies with OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) and FDA (Food and Drug Administration) guidelines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation