Commutative Algebra and Its Applications 2009
DOI: 10.1515/9783110213188.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

n-perfectness in pullbacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof. Note that G.gldim(R) = sup{Gid(M )|M an R − module} (by [4,Theorem 1.1]). Thus, using [14, Theorem 2.22], G.gldim(R) ≤ n ⇔ Ext i (I, M ) = 0 for each i > n and for any injective module I and each module M .…”
Section: On the Other Hand For Each Projectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Proof. Note that G.gldim(R) = sup{Gid(M )|M an R − module} (by [4,Theorem 1.1]). Thus, using [14, Theorem 2.22], G.gldim(R) ≤ n ⇔ Ext i (I, M ) = 0 for each i > n and for any injective module I and each module M .…”
Section: On the Other Hand For Each Projectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, T or i R⋉E (K, R) = 0 for all i > 0. Thus, using [13, Theorem 4.9], pd [4,Corollary 2.7]). Consequently, pd R⋉E (I) ≤ G.gldim(R) + n. Thus, from Lemma 2.7, we obtain the desired result.…”
Section: On the Other Hand For Each Projectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations