2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-010-1060-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomolar determination of hydrazine by TiO2 nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Inset of Figure 2 shows plot of I pc (cathodic peak current) of tinidazole versus  (scan rate). In contrast to the correlation coefficient of 0.9922 for the dependence of cathodic peak current on the square root of scan rate (data not shown), an improved correlation coefficient (R 2 ) of 0.9964 was obtained for the linear dependence of cathodic peak current on the scan rate showing that the kinetics of the reduction of tinidazole at carbon paste electrode is predominantly adsorption controlled [30]. Taking the integrated peak area of the peak at scan rate of 100 mV/s in Figure 2, the number of electrons participated in the rate determining step was estimated using equation 1 at a temperature of 31 …”
Section: Effect Of Scan Ratementioning
confidence: 45%
“…Inset of Figure 2 shows plot of I pc (cathodic peak current) of tinidazole versus  (scan rate). In contrast to the correlation coefficient of 0.9922 for the dependence of cathodic peak current on the square root of scan rate (data not shown), an improved correlation coefficient (R 2 ) of 0.9964 was obtained for the linear dependence of cathodic peak current on the scan rate showing that the kinetics of the reduction of tinidazole at carbon paste electrode is predominantly adsorption controlled [30]. Taking the integrated peak area of the peak at scan rate of 100 mV/s in Figure 2, the number of electrons participated in the rate determining step was estimated using equation 1 at a temperature of 31 …”
Section: Effect Of Scan Ratementioning
confidence: 45%
“…The correlation coefficient for first and second linearity was 0.9939 and 0.9962. The decrease in the sensitivity (slop), second linearity range was due to the kinetic limitations [30,34]. The detection limit for L-dopa in the lower range region was found to be 3.69 Â 10 À6 M and quantification limit was 12.3 Â 10 À6 M. The detection limit and limit of quantification was calculated by using the formulas, LOD = 3S/M and LOQ = 10S/M [35][36][37], where 'S' is the standard deviation and 'M' is the slop obtained from the calibration plots.…”
Section: Effect Of Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The correlation coefficient for the first linearity was 0.99997 and for the second it was found to be 0.99966. The decrease of sensitivity (slope) in the second linear range is likely to be due to kinetic limitation [23]. The detection limit for DA in the lower range region was found to be 1 × 10 −8 M and quantification limit was 3.3 × 10 −8 M. The detection limit and quantification limit was calculated by using the formulas, LOD = 3S/M and LOQ = 10S/M [24].…”
Section: Interference Studymentioning
confidence: 99%