Biopolymer Nanostructures for Food Encapsulation Purposes 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-815663-6.00018-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanostructures of gums for encapsulation of food ingredients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 224 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The zeta potential of particles varied from −35.24 to −31.19 mv in nanocapsules and from −35.72 to −31.01 mv in microparticles. The negative zeta potential of all particles is related to the presence of anionic groups in seed gum (Taheri & Jafari, 2019 ) and RE. The results of encapsulation efficiency of all samples showed higher encapsulation efficiency (50.0% ≤) which indicated the suitable encapsulating conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The zeta potential of particles varied from −35.24 to −31.19 mv in nanocapsules and from −35.72 to −31.01 mv in microparticles. The negative zeta potential of all particles is related to the presence of anionic groups in seed gum (Taheri & Jafari, 2019 ) and RE. The results of encapsulation efficiency of all samples showed higher encapsulation efficiency (50.0% ≤) which indicated the suitable encapsulating conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size and morphology of the electrosprayed structures are strongly dependent on the properties of the biopolymer solutions [ 30 , 31 , 32 ]. Therefore, the selected phycocolloid solutions were characterized in terms of pH, surface tension, and electrical conductivity prior to their processing, and the results are summarized in Table 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charge and size of the droplet can easily be controlled to some extent by adjusting the flow rate and voltage applied to the nozzle. Consequently, electrospraying has some advantages over conventional mechanical spraying systems, where droplets are charged by induction: i) it produces droplets of a smaller size, ii) their size distribution is usually narrow with low standard deviation, iii) the charged droplets are self-dispersing and no droplet agglomeration and coagulation occurs, iv) the motion of charged droplets can easily be controlled by electric fields such as deflection or focusing and v) the deposition efficiency of the charged spray is much higher than for uncharged droplets [80].…”
Section: Electrosprayingmentioning
confidence: 99%