2010
DOI: 10.1177/0193723509360217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

National Narratives in the Opening and Closing Ceremonies of the Athens 2004 Olympic Games

Abstract: By focusing on the cases of the Athens 2004 Olympic ceremonies, this article interrogates insular representations of the nation that are commonly nurtured by Olympic narratives. In particular, the article discusses the ways in which the Athens 2004 ceremonies articulated aspects of history, topography, and constituency in relation with Greece's present as well as with its past. By also locating instances that contest the perception of national identity as an overarching, unique, and pure entity, the article ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These examples demonstrate that megaevents are not necessarily stages for the display of universal human unity, but instead a convenient platform for protest. Mega-events, through series of set ceremonies and rituals (such as the opening and closing ceremonies of the Olympics), create a performative discourse of national identity (Chen et al, 2012;Hogan, 2003;Puijk, 2000) and national sentiment (pride or shame) (Traganou, 2010). The Olympic Games, in particular, become paramount representations of nation, where patriotism is broadcast by means of the opening and closing ceremonies (MacAloon, 1984).…”
Section: Events: Contexts For Emotional Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These examples demonstrate that megaevents are not necessarily stages for the display of universal human unity, but instead a convenient platform for protest. Mega-events, through series of set ceremonies and rituals (such as the opening and closing ceremonies of the Olympics), create a performative discourse of national identity (Chen et al, 2012;Hogan, 2003;Puijk, 2000) and national sentiment (pride or shame) (Traganou, 2010). The Olympic Games, in particular, become paramount representations of nation, where patriotism is broadcast by means of the opening and closing ceremonies (MacAloon, 1984).…”
Section: Events: Contexts For Emotional Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olympic ceremonies are based on a protocol specified by the Olympic Charter and also an artistic program, which is meant to present the culture of a host city/nation (Traganou, 2010).…”
Section: Olympic Ceremonies and National Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of tourism development, the Games brought about the unification of the city's urban landscape with the coast at the South (Kissoudi, 2008;Sykianaki, 2006), enriching this way its tourist product mix and facilitating the transportation of tourists, via the initially made for the Olympics, tram-line that connects the city center with Athens' southern outskirts (Boukas, Ziakas, & Boustras, 2012;Zografos & Deffner, 2007). Further, because the rationale for hosting the Olympics, was based on the intention to project the cultural identity of Athens and Greece (Boukas et al, 2013;Fauquembergue, 2008;Traganou, 2010), the Olympics acted as the medium for the unification, enhancement and projection of many areas with cultural significance (Beriatos & Gospodini, 2004). The cultural significance of the Olympics for Athens was also highlighted by the Olympic Truce (IOC, 2008), the Cultural Olympiad (ATHENS 2004(ATHENS , 2004, and the integration of modernity (Kissoudi, 2010) with the past (Khirfan, 2010) that exhibits the multicultural character of the city (ATHENS 2004(ATHENS , 2004Boukas et al, 2013).…”
Section: Athens' Olympic Legacymentioning
confidence: 99%